Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Immunocompromised patients are at risk for severe, prolonged herpes simplex virus (HSV) recurrences. Refractory disease and intolerance to standard therapy drive an unmet medical need. Pritelivir, a novel HSV helicase-primase inhibitor, has shown favorable tolerability and efficacy in immunocompetent adults. Methods PRIOH-1, a multicenter, randomized, open-label Phase 2 trial, compared oral pritelivir (400-mg loading dose followed by 100 mg daily) with intravenous foscarnet (40 mg/kg q8h or 60 mg/kg q12h) for up to 28 days in immunocompromised adults with acyclovir-refractory HSV (Part A). Participants with refractoriness/intolerance to foscarnet received pritelivir (Part B). The primary end point was time to lesion healing; secondary end points included healing rate, HSV DNA detection, and resistance. Results Twenty-two participants enrolled in Part A, 8 in Part B. In Part A, median time to healing was 26.0 days (95% CI, 13.0–31.0) with pritelivir, vs not estimable (95% CI, 20.0–NE) with foscarnet (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 0.33–21.8; P = .34). Investigator-assessed healing rates were 93% with pritelivir and 57% with foscarnet, a 36.2% difference (95% CI, −10.1 to 74.1; P = .077). Postbaseline HSV DNA detection rates were 34.8% and 50.0%, respectively (P = .42). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 60% of pritelivir- and 100% of foscarnet-treated participants; serious treatment-emergent adverse events were less frequent with pritelivir. In Part B, the median time to healing was 19.0 days, with a 63% healing rate. Conclusions Pritelivir demonstrated encouraging efficacy and favorable safety in immunocompromised adults with limited treatment options, supporting Phase 3 evaluation for the treatment of refractory HSV infection in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kotton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: