Emerging scholars reported experiences of unprofessional peer review, leading to hesitance in future submissions. While unprofessional reviews harm authors, editors play a key role in addressing these issues by maintaining ethical standards and transparency. Constructive feedback promotes author growth, and all participants in the editorial process share responsibility for professionalism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelly et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: