Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Piano key weirs (PKWs) provide high discharge efficiency within a limited footprint, but the influence of inlet- and outlet-key shapes on their energy dissipation has received limited attention. This study investigates the effects of curved inlet- and outlet-key geometries on PKW energy dissipation using 102 free-flow experimental runs. Nine configurations are tested: a linear reference (M1) and C-shaped, inverted C-shaped, S-shaped, and inverted S-shaped modifications applied separately to the inlet and outlet keys. A FLOW-3D HYDRO model is validated against the measurements, reproducing the total head with R2 = 0.997 and RMSE = 0.0013 m and the relative energy loss within ±15% (MAPE = 6.70%), and is then used to evaluate a combined configuration (M10) with C-shaped inlet and outlet keys. Experimental results show that the relative energy loss decreases with increasing total head ratio, from approximately 71–74% at low heads to 46–52% at higher heads. At HT/P = 0.18, the C-shaped inlet (M4) and outlet (M5) increase the relative energy loss by 12.80% and 8.27%, respectively, relative to M1. Compared with the numerically simulated M1, M10 is predicted to increase the relative energy loss by 5.86%, 9.64%, and 14.61% at HT/P = 0.08, 0.12, and 0.18, respectively. A logarithmic relationship fitted to 11 numerical runs is provided for estimating the relative energy loss of M10 within HT/P = 0.075–0.266. The results show that PKW energy dissipation depends strongly on curvature shape, orientation, and key location.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elbagoury et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: