Numerical and experimental modeling reveals improved discharge efficiency in type-A piano key weirs with inverted C-shaped inlets, indicating superior flow conveyance.
Piano key weirs (PKWs) increase the effective crest length and provide high discharge capacity within limited spillway widths; however, their hydraulic efficiency depends on key geometry. Addressing the limited understanding of key-curvature effects, this study systematically investigates the influence of inlet- and outlet-key curvature on the discharge coefficient (Cd) and crest-wise discharge distribution of type-A PKWs. Nine configurations are examined experimentally in a flume at the Hydraulics Research Institute, Egypt. These include a reference model with linear inlet and outlet keys and modified geometries incorporating C- and S-shaped keys in both normal and inverted forms. Experiments are conducted under free-flow conditions for total-head ratios HT/P up to 0.23, where HT is the total upstream head above the crest and P is the PKW height. A three-dimensional numerical model using FLOW-3D HYDRO is validated against these experimental data and subsequently extended to HT/P ≈ 0.50–0.60. All reported results and conclusions are based on the numerical simulations over the full investigated range. Results show that Cd increases to a peak near HT/P ≈ 0.08 and then decreases gradually for all configurations. Both inlet- and outlet-key curvature influence hydraulic performance by modifying flow guidance and redistribution along the crest. However, only the inverted C-shaped inlet configuration (M2) improves efficiency, increasing Cd by about 5.46% on average over the investigated head range and enhancing the total discharge by approximately 4.36% at HT/P ≈ 0.12 relative to the reference case. Discharge-distribution analysis indicates that this improvement results from inlet feeding and efficient flow conveyance along the sidewall crest. A predictive relation is developed for the optimal configuration to support hydraulic design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaheen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: