Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The goal of this column is to help experienced clinicians navigate the judicial system when they are confronted with requests for capacity evaluations that involve guardianship (conservatorship). The interface between the growing elderly medical population and increasing requests for substituted decision making is becoming more complex. This column will help practicing psychiatrists understand the medical, legal, and societal factors involved in adult guardianship. Such understanding is necessary in order to effectively perform guardianship evaluations and adequately inform courts, patients, and families about the psychiatric diagnoses central to substituted decision making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leatherman et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: