Key result
Higher socioeconomic status is linked to ~26% lower incident CHD risk, partially mediated by plasma proteins.
Why the study?
Socioeconomic status is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease burden and risk, and plasma proteins may elucidate a biological mechanism through which low SES increases cardiovascular disease risk.
Do plasma proteins mediate the association between socioeconomic status and incident coronary heart disease and stroke events in multi-cohort populations?
Cohort (n=4,210)
Yes
Do plasma proteins mediate the association between socioeconomic status and incident coronary heart disease and stroke events in multi-cohort populations?
Hazard Ratio: 0.74 (95% CI 0.63–0.87)
Higher socioeconomic status is associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease, an effect that is statistically mediated by 21 specific plasma proteins, suggesting biological pathways linking social factors to cardiovascular disease.
Background Socioeconomic status (SES) is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease burden and risk. Plasma proteins may elucidate a biological mechanism through which low SES increases the risk of cardiovascular disease. Methods Participants from the following 3 cohorts were included: the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (n=2139), Jackson Heart Study (n=967), and Women's Health Initiative (n=1104). SES was approximated using a cumulative score (range 0–3) across education, income, and employment status. A meta‐analysis of Cox proportional hazards ratios was used to assess the association between SES and incident events for coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke. Linear regression was used within each cohort to determine associations between SES and Olink proteins (n=1270 proteins) and the results were meta‐analyzed across cohorts. Regression‐based mediation analysis was used to determine whether the identified proteins were statistical mediators of the association of SES and incident events. Results Higher SES scores were associated with a lower risk of CHD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.63–0.87]) and stroke (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.66–1.00]). After correcting for multiple testing ( P <3.937×10 −5 ), 233 proteins were associated with SES in the meta‐analysis. Of these 233 proteins, 21 had a significant indirect effect on SES and CHD. Because the SES‐stroke association was not statistically significant, proteins were not tested as mediators. Conclusions Our analysis of multiple cohorts identified evidence of different proteomic pathways associated with SES and cardiovascular disease. This work suggests that exogenous social factors (eg, SES) may influence cardiovascular disease via proteomic profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glover et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease and stroke) (n=4,210). Higher socioeconomic status (cumulative score 0-3 across education, income, and employment status) vs. Lower socioeconomic status was evaluated on Incident coronary heart disease (CHD) (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.87). Higher socioeconomic status was associated with lower incident coronary heart disease risk (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63-0.87), mediated by 21 plasma proteins.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: