Key result
Low socioeconomic status in patients with coronary heart disease was associated with higher odds of smoking in men (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.37-1.95) and other adverse cardiovascular risk factors.
Why the study?
While socioeconomic status strongly affects atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in primary prevention, these associations are less documented in patients with existing disease in secondary prevention.
Is low socioeconomic status associated with a worse cardiovascular risk profile in patients with coronary heart disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=8,261)
Yes
Is low socioeconomic status associated with a worse cardiovascular risk profile in patients with coronary heart disease?
Odds Ratio: 1.63 (95% CI 1.37–1.95)
Low socioeconomic status remains strongly associated with worse cardiovascular risk profiles, poorer lifestyle habits, and lower adherence to secondary prevention therapies in patients with coronary heart disease.
Low SES linked to adverse risk profiles in CHD; leaves open whether targeted interventions reduce disparities.
OBJECTIVE: People's socioeconomic status (SES) has a major impact on the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in primary prevention. In patients with existing ASCVD these associations are less documented. Here, we evaluate to what extent SES is still associated with patients' risk profile in secondary prevention. METHODS: Based on results from a large sample of patients with coronary heart disease from the European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events study, the relationship between SES and cardiovascular risk was examined. A SES summary score was empirically constructed from the patients' educational level, self-perceived income, living situation and perception of loneliness. RESULTS: Analyses are based on observations in 8261 patients with coronary heart disease from 27 countries. Multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrate that a low SES is associated (OR, 95% CI) with lifestyles such as smoking in men (1.63, 1.37 to 1.95), physical activity in men (1.51, 1.28 to 1.78) and women (1.77, 1.32 to 2.37) and obesity in men 1.28 (1.11 to 1.49) and women 1.65 (1.30 to 2.10). Patients with a low SES have more raised blood pressure in men (1.24, 1.07 to 1.43) and women (1.31, 1.03 to 1.67), used less statins and were less adherent to them. Cardiac rehabilitation programmes were less advised and attended by patients with a low SES. Access to statins in middle-income countries was suboptimal leaving about 80% of patients not reaching the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target of <1.8 mmol/L. Patients' socioeconomic level was also strongly associated with markers of well-being. CONCLUSION: These results illustrate the complexity of the associations between SES, well-being and secondary prevention in patients with ASCVD. They emphasise the need for integrating innovative policies in programmes of cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bacquer et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease (n=8,261). Low socioeconomic status vs. Higher socioeconomic status was evaluated on Smoking in men (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.37-1.95). Low socioeconomic status in patients with coronary heart disease was associated with higher odds of smoking in men (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.37-1.95) and other adverse cardiovascular risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: