Key result
Both 4-week HIIT and MIIT significantly reduced GAD-7 (-4.4 and -4.8 points, p<0.001) and PHQ-9 (-3.7 and -3.5 points, p<0.001) scores with no significant between-group differences after FDR correction.
Why the study?
Does 4-week supervised outpatient high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improve anxiety, depressive symptoms, and cardiopulmonary fitness compared to moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT) in cardiovascular disease patients with comorbid anxiety and/or depression?
Observational (n=112)
Does 4-week supervised outpatient high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improve anxiety, depressive symptoms, and cardiopulmonary fitness compared to moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT) in cardiovascular disease patients with comorbid anxiety and/or depression?
Standardized Mean Difference: -1.023
Absolute Event Rate: -4.4% vs -4.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
Short-term (4-week) supervised HIIT and MIIT are both comparably effective in significantly reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms while improving cardiopulmonary fitness in CVD patients with psychological comorbidities.
BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depressive symptoms are common in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and are associated with poorer prognosis. Exercise-based rehabilitation may improve both psychological and cardiopulmonary outcomes in this population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the short-term effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT) in CVD patients with comorbid anxiety and/or depression. METHODS: This retrospective real-world study screened 1,020 cardiac rehabilitation patients, of whom 112 were included in the final analysis. All participants completed a 4-week supervised outpatient HIIT or MIIT. Anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed using the GAD-7 and PHQ-9, and cardiopulmonary fitness was evaluated by standardized cardiopulmonary exercise testing. RESULTS: After 4 weeks, in the HIIT group, GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores decreased by 4.4 ± 4.3 and 3.7 ± 4.3 points (Cohen's d = -1.023 and -0.860; p < 0.001); in the MIIT group, the corresponding reductions were 4.8 ± 4.9 and 3.5 ± 4.0 points (Cohen's d = -0.980 and -0.875; p < 0.001). Both groups also demonstrated significant improvements in multiple cardiopulmonary parameters (all p < 0.05). Nominal between-group differences were observed for AT VO₂ and PETCO₂ before multiplicity correction, but neither difference remained statistically significant after FDR correction. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, short-term HIIT and MIIT may both be feasible strategies to alleviate psychological symptoms and improve cardiopulmonary fitness in CVD patients with comorbid anxiety or depression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease with comorbid anxiety and/or depression (n=112). High-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. Moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT) was evaluated on Anxiety (GAD-7) and depressive (PHQ-9) symptom score reductions and cardiopulmonary fitness parameters (Cohen's d -1.023 (HIIT GAD-7); -0.980 (MIIT GAD-7), p=<0.001). Both 4-week HIIT and MIIT significantly reduced GAD-7 (-4.4 and -4.8 points, p<0.001) and PHQ-9 (-3.7 and -3.5 points, p<0.001) scores with no significant between-group differences after FDR correction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: