Background: Contemporary Australian guidelines for the management of melioidosis recommend a longer duration of intravenous antibiotics during the intensive phase of treatment; recurrent disease is now far less common. A high rate of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to the currently recommended minimum of 3 months of oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) eradication therapy questions the incremental value of this phase of treatment. Methods: In this pilot, single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial, adults with culture-confirmed melioidosis received either prolonged intravenous intensive-phase therapy followed by oral eradication-phase therapy with TMP/SMX (standard therapy) or prolonged intravenous intensive-phase therapy alone (short-course therapy). The primary outcome was culture-confirmed recurrence at 2 years. Secondary outcomes included clinical (culture-unconfirmed) recurrence and ADRs to TMP/SMX. Results: Among 33 participants, 5 had culture-confirmed recurrence: 0/16 in the standard therapy group and 5/17 (29%) in the short-course therapy group. One participant (6%) in the standard therapy group had clinical recurrence. An ADR to TMP/SMX occurred in 13/16 (81%) in the standard therapy group, necessitating TMP/SMX cessation in 7/13 (44%), hospitalization in 5/13 (38%), and intensive care unit admission in 1/13 (8%). Conclusions: Prolonged intravenous antibiotics alone will cure many patients with melioidosis; however, some still require oral eradication therapy. The potential for recurrence of life-threatening melioidosis must be balanced against the high rate of significant ADRs to high-dose TMP/SMX. This necessitates a greater understanding of the individuals at highest risk of recurrence and determination of the optimal dosing and duration of eradication therapy in those who need it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: