Key result
Coronary CTA (16- and 64-slice) detects coronary artery stenoses with 83%-99% sensitivity, 93%-98% specificity, and 95%-100% negative predictive value versus invasive angiography.
Why the study?
Recent developments in computed tomography technology have enabled coronary artery imaging, though rapid vessel motion and small dimensions make coronary computed tomography angiography challenging.
Does 16- and 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography accurately detect coronary artery stenoses compared to invasive coronary angiography?
Does 16- and 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography accurately detect coronary artery stenoses compared to invasive coronary angiography?
16- and 64-slice coronary CTA demonstrates a high negative predictive value (95% to 100%), making it a useful diagnostic technique to rule out coronary stenoses in selected patients with a low pretest likelihood of disease.
Recent developments in computed tomography technology have made imaging of the coronary arteries possible. All the same, the rapid motion and small dimensions of the coronary vessels make coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA) challenging. With the last generations of 16- and 64-slice computed tomography and adequate patient preparation (which includes lowering of the heart rate), rates of sensitivity ranging from 83% to 99% and specificity between 93% and 98% have been reported for the detection of coronary artery stenoses in comparison with invasive coronary angiography. The high negative predictive value (95% to 100%) found in these studies suggests that coronary CTA may be a useful diagnostic technique to rule out the presence of coronary stenoses in selected patients, especially those with a rather low pretest likelihood of disease. Imaging of coronary artery bypass grafts is reliable, but clinical applications can be hampered by difficulties in assessing the native coronary arteries in patients after undergoing bypass because of their often-severe calcification. The detection of in-stent restenosis is made difficult by artifacts caused by metal, especially in smaller stents. Finally, initial reports that coronary CTA allows the detection and, to a certain extent, also the characterization and quantification of noncalcified coronary arteriosclerotic plaque are interesting, but they currently do not provide sufficient data to support clinical applications in the context of risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephan S. Achenbach (2006) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease / coronary artery stenoses. Coronary computed tomography angiography (16- and 64-slice) vs. Invasive coronary angiography was evaluated on Detection of coronary artery stenoses. Coronary CTA (16- and 64-slice) detects coronary artery stenoses with 83%-99% sensitivity, 93%-98% specificity, and 95%-100% negative predictive value versus invasive angiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: