Key result
Composite copula modeling outperforms single models in characterizing positive BMI-blood pressure associations across subgroups.
Why the study?
Existing approaches to studying BMI and blood pressure model SBP and DBP separately or use binary hypertension indicators, ignoring physiological correlation and continuous information. Furthermore, mean-based regression fails to capture the extreme BP elevations most critical for cardiovascular risk assessment.
Does a joint extreme value and mixed copula blood pressure index better capture extreme SBP-DBP tail dependence and quantify the association between BMI and concurrent blood pressure elevation across age and sex subgroups compared with conventional modeling approaches?
Cross-Sectional (n=41,451)
Does a joint extreme value and mixed copula blood pressure index better capture extreme SBP-DBP tail dependence and quantify the association between BMI and concurrent blood pressure elevation across age and sex subgroups compared with conventional modeling approaches?
Combining extreme value theory with mixed copulas provides a continuous, dependence-adjusted blood pressure index that captures concurrent extreme SBP and DBP elevations and reveals age-, sex-, and period-specific heterogeneity in BMI-blood pressure associations.
Composite BP modeling may refine joint tail analysis in cohorts; leaves open whether the BMI index improves clinical risk stratification.
Overweight and hypertension are two critical cardiovascular risk factors, making the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and blood pressure (BP) particularly important for early prevention. Existing approaches that model systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) separately, or reduce BP to a binary hypertension indicator, either ignore their inherent physiological correlation or discard clinically relevant continuous information. Furthermore, reliance on mean-based regression fails to capture the extreme elevations most critical for cardiovascular risk assessment. We propose a framework combining extreme value theory and mixed copula modeling to construct a joint, continuous BP index. Marginal distributions of SBP and DBP were fitted using a Lognormal-Generalized Pareto distribution composite model, and their dependence structure was captured via mixed copulas. The resulting BP index was regressed on BMI using weighted least squares. The framework was applied to 41,451 health examination records from Suzhou, China (2021-2023), stratified by age and sex, with 39,740 from 2011-2013 and 114,096 records from 2016–2018 serving as a temporal reference. The Lognormal–Generalized Pareto distribution composite model provided a superior fit to the empirical SBP and DBP distributions compared with single parametric distributions across all age and sex subgroups. Mixed copulas outperformed single copulas in capturing dependence structure in all subgroups. In the most recent 2021–2023 cohort, younger and middle-aged adults exhibited strong upper-tail dependence (indicating substantial co-movement of extreme SBP and DBP), whereas older adults demonstrated a progressive decoupling of the two measurements. Within this same period, BMI was positively associated with the BP index in nearly all subgroups. Across the three study periods, both the dependence structures and BMI coefficients showed heterogeneous and non-monotonic patterns, with significant reductions in the BMI coefficients in 2021–2023 concentrated primarily among several male age groups. The proposed framework captures marginal tail behavior and joint SBP–DBP dependence and provides a continuous summary of concurrent BP elevation. The age–sex-specific results revealed heterogeneous dependence structures and BMI associations across demographic groups and study periods. These findings highlight the potential value of incorporating tail and dependence modeling into epidemiological analyses, and future research should validate the framework in independent prospective cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lian et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Blood pressure extremes and body mass index (BMI) association in health examination participants (n=41,451). Body mass index (BMI) and joint extreme value/mixed copula blood pressure modeling framework vs. Single parametric marginal distributions, single copulas, and conventional blood pressure measures (SBP alone, DBP alone, pulse pressure, combined SBP-DBP, and 140/90 mmHg threshold) was evaluated on Joint continuous blood pressure (BP) index derived from a Lognormal-Generalized Pareto distribution composite marginal model and mixed copula dependence structure, and its weighted least squares association with BMI. Lognormal-Generalized Pareto composite marginals with mixed copulas outperformed single models across all subgroups, showing positive BMI-BP index associations in 2021-2023 (n=41,451).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: