Key result
Pragmatic trial strategies achieve ~17% reach while enrolling a representative primary care population.
Why the study?
Clinical trial results are often not generalizable because enrolled cohorts frequently fail to represent older and real-world populations. This study evaluated whether prespecified pragmatic enrollment and intervention strategies improved source-population reach and reduced enrollment bias in a hypertension trial among older adults.
Do prespecified pragmatic enrollment and intervention strategies improve source-population reach and representativeness in a hypertension trial enrolling older adults with multiple comorbidities?
Cross-Sectional (n=6,006)
Yes
Do prespecified pragmatic enrollment and intervention strategies improve source-population reach and representativeness in a hypertension trial enrolling older adults with multiple comorbidities?
An integrated package of pragmatic enrollment strategies achieved a 16.7% source-population reach—substantially higher than the 3–7% reported in prior pragmatic hypertension trials—while enrolling an older, multimorbid cohort closely representative of real-world primary care patients.
Pragmatic strategies may improve reach and representativeness in older hypertensive adults; leaves open optimal implementation for future trials.
Results of clinical trials are often not generalizable as the trial cohort often does not represent older and real-world populations. In a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study of remote monitoring and management of hypertension, we used pragmatic enrollment and intervention strategies to improve reach and enroll a trial cohort similar to the older primary care clinic population with uncontrolled hypertension. We evaluated whether prespecified pragmatic strategies — including broad inclusion criteria, automated identification, an opt-out approach to initial contact, low study burden, phone-based study visits, and stakeholder engagement — were associated with improved source-population reach and reduced enrollment bias. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of enrollment data from a multicenter randomized controlled hybrid type 1 trial enrolling adults 65 years or older with inadequately controlled hypertension from primary care clinics within two large health systems. We compared characteristics of enrolled patients with those of all eligible primary care patients meeting criteria for guideline directed blood pressure lowering. Among 64,671 patients 65 years or older who had primary care visits during the enrollment period, 6,006 were potentially eligible and 1,000 were enrolled and randomized, yielding a source-population reach of 16.7%. Compared with eligible non-enrolled patients, enrolled patients were slightly younger (73 ± 6 vs. 75 ± 7 years) and had a lower prevalence of stroke (5.9% vs. 8.9%). The groups were otherwise similar with respect to sex, Black race, Charlson comorbidity index, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Logically integrated, prespecified, pragmatic enrollment strategies supported enrollment of a cohort of older adults with hypertension that was similar to the eligible primary care population across key measured characteristics. These strategies may serve as a framework for trials seeking to improve external validation. This trial is registered in clinicaltrials.org as “Remote Monitoring and Virtual Collaborative Care for Hypertension Control to Prevent Cognitive Decline Phase II (vCCC 2)” NCT05138601 with a registration date of 12-01-2021. NCT5138601.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Inadequately controlled hypertension in older adults (n=6,006). Pragmatic enrollment and intervention strategies (broad inclusion criteria, automated EHR identification, opt-out initial contact, phone-based visits, embedded clinical pharmacists) vs. Eligible non-enrolled primary care patients (n=4,828) was evaluated on Source-population reach (proportion of potentially eligible patients enrolled and randomized) and representativeness. Pragmatic enrollment strategies achieved a 16.7% source-population reach (1,000 of 6,006 eligible) and enrolled a cohort similar to the eligible primary care population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: