Key result
First-pass gated 15O-water PET correlates strongly with SPECT for LV volumes and moderately for EF.
Why the study?
The feasibility of estimating left ventricular and right ventricular volume and function using first-pass gated 15O-water PET had not been established.
Observational (n=19)
No
Supports integrated perfusion-function PET; extends correlative validation but leaves open outcome-based adoption.
We investigated the feasibility of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volume and function estimation using a first-pass gated 15 O-water PET. This prospective study included 19 patients addressed for myocardial perfusion reserve assessment using 15 O-water PET. PET data were acquired at rest and after regadenoson stress, and gated first-pass images were reconstructed over the time range corresponding to tracer first-pass through the cardiac cavities and post-processed using TomPool software; LV and RV were segmented using a semi-automated 4D immersion algorithm. LV volumes were computed using a count-based model and a fixed threshold at 30% of the maximal activity. RV volumes were computed using a geometrical model and an adjustable threshold that was set so as to fit LV and RV stroke volumes. Ejection curves were fitted using a deformable reference curve model. LV results were compared to those obtained using 99m Tc-sestamibi gated myocardial SPECT in terms of end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF). There was an excellent concordance between rest and stress PET in terms of EDV and ESV (Lin’s coefficient ~ 0.85–0.90), SV (~ 0.80), and EF (~ 0.75) for both ventricles. Correlation with myocardial SPECT was high for LV EDV (Pearson’s R = 0.89, p < 0.001) and ESV ( R = 0.87, p < 0.001) and satisfying for LV SV ( R = 0.67, p < 0.001) and EF ( R = 0.67, p < 0.001). Minimal LV ESV overestimation (+ 4 mL, p = 0.03) and EF underestimation (− 4%, p = 0.01) were observed using PET. Biventricular volume and function assessment are achievable using the first-pass PET, and LV parameters correlate well with those derived from gated myocardial SPECT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bouallègue et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Suspected coronary artery disease with significant coronary stenosis (n=19). First-pass gated 15O-water PET vs. 99mTc-sestamibi gated myocardial SPECT was evaluated on Correlation and agreement of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF) between first-pass 15O-water PET and gated myocardial SPECT (R = 0.89 (LV EDV), R = 0.87 (LV ESV), R = 0.67 (LV SV and EF), p=<0.001). First-pass gated 15O-water PET strongly correlated with 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT for LV EDV (R=0.89, p<0.001) and ESV (R=0.87, p<0.001), and moderately for EF (R=0.67, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: