The relative stabilities of 1-aryl-1-(trifluoromethyl)ethyl cations were determined by measuring the proton-transfer equilibria of 1-aryl-1-(trifluoromethyl)ethylenes or the chloride-transfer equilibria of 1-aryl-1-(trifluoromethyl)ethyl chlorides in the gas phase. The stability of 1-phenyl-1-(trifluoromethyl)ethyl cation was found to be 16 kcal mol−1 lower than that of the α-cumyl (1-phenyl-1-methylethyl) cation. The substituent effect on the stability of this cation can be correlated in terms of the Yukawa–Tsuno equation, giving an r+ of 1.41 and a ρ of −10.0 (in log K/Ko−1 unit). While the ρ value is nearly identical to that of the α-cumyl cation series, the r+ value is remarkably higher than the value of unity for the α-cumyl cation, indicating that such a highly electron-deficient carbocation system should be characterized by an extremely large r+ value compared with that of the stable α-cumyl cation. In addition, this r+ value agrees with that for the SN1 solvolysis of 1-aryl-1-(trifluoromethyl)ethyl tosylates. Such agreement of the r+ values between the gas phase and solvolysis reactions has been generally observed for the benzylic carbocation systems. It is concluded that the enhanced r+ value for the solvolysis of 1-aryl-1-(trifluoromethyl)ethyl tosylates must reflect the intrinsic resonance demand characteristic of the parent 1-phenyl-1-(trifluoromethyl)ethyl cation, itself, and that the extremely large ρ+ values given by a simple correlation with σ+ (r+ = 1) are an artifact due to an improper analysis of underestimating the resonance demand for such highly deactivated substrates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishima et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: