Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Malawi's community mental health system depends on a first-contact decision that patients and families make before any clinical encounter: whether to present at a formal community mental health service or at a traditional healer. Co-location of the two has been proposed as a way of shortening that pathway, but the proposal has not been specified as a testable choice problem. The indicator, drawn from 15 African country surveys conducted between 2021 and 2025, has a mean of 29.733 and a standard deviation of 17.495, with country values ranging from 6.60 in Mali to 73.40 in Malawi. These values are used to calibrate the community-engagement attribute levels that anchor the DCE. The paper specifies attributes, levels, an orthogonal fractional factorial design, a conditional logit estimator, and a latent-class extension, and it states the identification assumptions under which co-location effects on first-contact pathway selection would be interpretable. The contribution is a design specification and a set of derived propositions, not an estimated treatment effect; the paper argues that co-location should be modelled as a bundle of separable attributes rather than as a single binary policy, because the attributes have different implications for demand, equity and clinical safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phiri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: