Background Prenatal exposure to ambient ozone has been hypothesized to increase the risk of congenital heart defects (CHD) in offspring; however, epidemiological evidence remains inconclusive.Objective To quantitatively synthesize the available evidence on the association between prenatal ambient ozone exposure and the risk of congenital heart defects (CHD) in offspring, and to explore potential effect modifiers through subgroup analyses and meta regression.Methods The PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and CNKI databases were systemically searched from from 1970 until April 2026 to find articles related to offspring CHD and periconceptional ozone exposure. Inverse variance weighted random-effects multilevel models were conducted to pool estimates and stratify associations by heart defect type, country income level, study design, investigation time period, and data source. Dose-response relationships were examined via meta-regression and the heterogeneity and publication bias in relevant studies was also examined.Results A total of 29 studies comprising 302 effect estimates were identified. The overall pooled odds ratio for the association between prenatal ozone exposure and CHD was 1.032 (95% CI: 1.004–1.060). Stronger associations were observed for transposition of the great arteries (OR =1.172), conotruncal defects (OR =1.134), and atrioventricular septal defects (OR =1.204). The embryonic period was the most susceptible exposure window (OR =1.064, 95% CI: 1.006–1.126). Stronger effects were found in upper-middle-income countries (OR =1.039), studies conducted after 2020 (OR =1.145), and hospital-based data (OR =1.112). Dose-response analysis suggested a 1% odds increase per 10 μg/m3 ozone increment, though not statistically significant. Considerable heterogeneity was observed.Conclusions This meta-analysis suggests that prenatal ozone exposure may modestly increase CHD risk. The substantial heterogeneity highlights the need for standardized exposure assessment and further prospective studies.Implication Statement: This meta-analysis provides quantitative evidence that prenatal ozone exposure is associated with a modest increase in congenital heart defect risk, with stronger effects observed in upper-middle-income countries and more recent studies. The embryonic developmental window emerged as the most susceptible exposure period. These findings inform air quality management by identifying specific exposure windows and vulnerable populations for targeted intervention, and support the refinement of WHO ozone guidelines and national ambient air quality standards to better protect fetal health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
姚永娜 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: