The closure of physical community mental health clinics in South African townships and their replacement with digital-only access has been justified as a cost-effective response to resource constraints, yet the consequences for engagement among people with severe mental illness remain poorly understood. The framework specifies engagement as a function of access modality, illness severity, and the interaction between them, and it identifies the conditions under which digital-only access is expected to widen rather than narrow engagement gaps. To anchor the framework in observable parameters, the paper reports a secondary analysis of the DHS Program indicator 'Discontinuation due to access/availability' across 28 African countries and 74 country-survey observations from 1992 to 2025. The mean value of the indicator was 1.712 (SD = 1.37), with country-level values ranging from 0.25 in Morocco to 4.90 in Lesotho. These descriptive parameters establish the scale of access-related discontinuation in comparable settings and inform the power calculations that any evaluation of clinic closure would require. Digital-only access is not a neutral substitution for physical clinics but a modality shift that redistributes engagement costs onto the most severely ill, and it proposes a set of falsifiable propositions and a research design capable of testing them. The contribution is a specification of the mechanisms through which access modality affects engagement, together with the empirical parameters needed to evaluate closure policies in township contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ndlovu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: