Floating offshore wind turbines operate under continuously varying atmospheric and ocean conditions, whose influence is not explicitly accounted for in conventional blade-pitch controller scheduling. As a result, control strategies designed to provide strong rotor-speed regulation may introduce unnecessary blade-pitch activity under certain environmental conditions. This work proposes a metocean-dependent control methodology that adapts the regulation authority to the prevailing wind and wave excitation, balancing power regulation and actuator demand. A family of controllers with different regulation capabilities is developed, and a reduced-order control-oriented model is used to map turbulent wind and wave disturbances into the closed-loop response, enabling the selection of the most suitable controller for each metocean condition. The floating-feedback filter bandwidth is also adapted to limit wave-induced control activity. The methodology is evaluated through nonlinear OpenFAST simulations under five representative metocean conditions at a mean wind speed of 12 m/s. Compared with an advanced baseline controller, the proposed strategy reduces collective blade-pitch activity by approximately 52–64%, while maintaining comparable power regulation. Platform-pitch fluctuations are reduced across all investigated conditions, together with reductions in tower-base fore–aft damage-equivalent loads of approximately 2–18%. The results demonstrate that maximizing regulation authority is not always the most effective control strategy, and that metocean-dependent controller selection can substantially reduce actuator demand while preserving regulation performance and improving the structural response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pascali et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: