The wastewater sector faces a growing need to transition towards energy-neutral operations. Despite this context, no dedicated benchmarking framework exists for assessing the techno-economic efficiency of bioenergy generation in water utilities. This study addresses that gap by introducing the Bioenergy Efficiency Index (BioEI), a novel synthetic indicator estimated using the Efficiency Analysis Tree (EAT) method. It is a non-parametric machine learning approach that integrates classification and regression tree algorithms with production frontier analysis, avoiding the overfitting limitations of non-parametric methods. The BioEI is applied to a panel of 50 observations covering the ten water and sewerage companies in England and Wales over the period 2020–21 to 2024–25. The input is total bioresources cost; the desirable outputs are energy generated and used internally and energy exported; the undesirable output is energy generated but unused. Results reveal substantial and persistent heterogeneity in bioenergy performance, with a sector-average BioEI of 0.555 and with no discernible sector-wide improvement over the study period, which coincides with the PR19 bioresources price-control period. The EAT identifies sample-specific expenditure partitions that define different cost-conditional bioenergy benchmarks. Unused energy averages approximately 60,741 MWh per utility-year. Sensitivity analysis using free disposal hull and data envelopment analysis confirms substantial performance heterogeneity and the absence of sustained sector-wide improvement, but reveals considerable estimator dependence in absolute efficiency scores and individual utility rankings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molinos‐Senante et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: