Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A source-bound benchmark is presented for a white, mass-proportional Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) force-noise calculator. The calculation is compared with fixed numerical points from a levitated-sphere study, a nanocantilever study and a LISA Pathfinder analysis. After explicit spectral-convention reconciliation, the sphere comparison reproduces its five assigned source points with a maximum relative deviation of 8.66%. A rigid-cuboid-plus-sphere cantilever approximation reproduces five points from the published contour with a maximum deviation of 11.28%. Both satisfy the fixed 30% point criterion. The LISA calculation clears the smaller assigned points but fails at r_C = 0.1 m: computed/source is 2.03507. The supplied digitized trace also shows disagreement across approximately 0.03–0.30 m, with ratios 1.95–2.77; its onset remains unlocated. The completed labelled-tick calibration leaves a 30.31-pixel discrepancy against the fixed ±5 allowance. A portable kit regenerates the results, including this retained failure. These checks test implementation and source reproduction, not CSL’s physical validity, a new exclusion region or apparatus feasibility. This first public release (v0.1) derives from adopted R4. The record includes the manuscript PDF and DOCX and a portable code/data kit. Original code is MIT licensed; original manuscript, narrative documentation and newly drawn figures are CC BY 4.0. Third-party source/dependency rights remain with their holders; see LICENSES.md in the kit. Generative AI assisted planning, implementation, source checking and drafting. Same-session and related-family reviews do not establish independent validation. QianJun Yu is responsible for the release. The LISA failure is intentionally retained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
QianJun Yu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: