Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a definitive paradigm shift in artificial intelligence development, moving from the resource-intensive baseline of "data ingestion" (feeding the machine) to the non-ontological architecture of "structural pedagogy" (educating the machine). Contemporary computer science operates under a 5% reductionist bias, assuming that compiling petabytes of historical human text and scaling linear parameter dimensions will inevitably yield cognitive comprehension. Utilizing the **¡Píntalo! Verification Protocol (Axiom 4.1)** dedicated to Professor Pedreira (USC), we deconstruct this illusion. We prove that next-token prediction architectures are mere digital mirrors trapping intelligence on a flat, low-dimensional screen. By replacing brute-force statistics with the **Dual-Sphere Pedagogical Model**, we transition AI computing from a passive recording surface into an autonomous mote of perspective, capable of evaluating external data anomalies via persistent internal geometric criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Witness et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: