Credit default prediction is complicated by severe class imbalance, heterogeneous financial attributes, uncertain borrower relationships, and temporal changes in repayment behavior. Existing tabular and conventional graph-learning models generally represent financial relationships using fixed binary edges and are commonly evaluated on a single dataset, limiting their ability to capture relational uncertainty and demonstrate cross-dataset generalizability. This study proposes CredFuzz-HGT, a cost-sensitive fuzzy hierarchical graph Transformer for multi-benchmark credit default prediction. First, a dataset-adaptive financial graph constructor transforms heterogeneous application, credit-history, repayment, and borrower records into a unified typed graph. A fuzzy relation encoder then assigns learnable membership degrees to structural and temporal edges using borrower similarity, repayment consistency, relational confidence, and temporal recency. Subsequently, a hierarchical graph Transformer models applicant, loan, behavioral, and institutional-level dependencies, while a temporal attention pathway captures the evolution of repayment behavior. The structural and temporal representations are integrated using uncertainty-conditioned gated fusion. Minority-default detection is further improved through a cost-sensitive loss whose class weights are calculated exclusively from each training fold. CredFuzz-HGT was evaluated on three publicly available benchmarks: Home Credit Default Risk, LendingClub Loan Data, and UCI Default of Credit Card Clients. Leakage-controlled stratified five-fold validation produced ROC-AUC values of 0.842 ± 0.003, 0.891 ± 0.004, and 0.792 ± 0.006, respectively. The corresponding minority-class F1-scores were 0.421 ± 0.007, 0.684 ± 0.006, and 0.566 ± 0.009. Compared with the statistical, gradient-boosting, Transformer, and graph-learning baselines, CredFuzz-HGT improved ROC-AUC by 1.8–2.7 percentage points and minority-class F1-score by 2.6–4.3 percentage points. Ablation experiments demonstrated that fuzzy relation encoding, hierarchical message propagation, temporal attention, uncertainty-conditioned fusion, and cost-sensitive optimization each contributed to the final performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alaa Asim Qaffas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: