The placebo-controlled PENS trial showed that shunting improves gait but not cognition or continence in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). This selective response highlights an unresolved problem: even among patients who respond to temporary cerebrospinal-fluid (CSF) drainage, we cannot predict which deficits will reverse after shunting. Static structural and perfusion markers, including white-matter hyperintensity load, cerebral small-vessel-disease burden, and baseline cerebral blood flow, do not predict shunt response. In contrast, impaired cerebrovascular reactivity is associated with a favorable response, yet cerebral autoregulation has not been measured before and after CSF diversion. I propose that reversibility in iNPH reflects recoverable hemodynamic reserve, and that this hypothesis can be tested within the existing diagnostic pathway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hajime Takase (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: