Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper covers the development of a neuromuscular model for use in driver simulation, focusing on the inclusion of a representation of co-activation. Co-activation is thought to function as a combination of feed-forward control (based on future predictions of the task being undertaken) and feedback control (to reject disturbances). A linear model of the neuromuscular system, muscles, limbs and vehicle was set up. Linear quadratic regulator control was used to minimise path-following error and a representation of the muscle's metabolic energy consumption. It is shown that the model can be used to generate feed-forward control signals whilst simultaneously minimising the feedback error signal (necessary in real muscles for effective disturbance rejection), but that there is a trade-off between minimisation of the feedback error signal and energy consumption. The controller is able to adapt to the increases in reflex delay and gain to maintain control using the feed-forward mechanism. Large reflex gain and delay increases are shown to destabilise the system, consistent with suggestions that, in humans, the reflex gain is small to avoid instability. The model is shown to be capable of rejecting external disturbances via the stretch reflex.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoult et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: