Key result
Smaller surgical valve ID linked to ~31% higher odds of elevated gradient after ViV TAVI.
Why the study?
Although valve-in-valve TAVI is the preferred therapy for degenerated surgical bioprostheses, residual gradients, patient-prosthesis mismatch, and coronary obstruction remain major concerns.
Does a standardized transfemoral valve-in-valve TAVI strategy (incorporating surgical valve fracture when appropriate) provide safe procedural outcomes and durable 1-year hemodynamics in patients with symptomatic structural valve degeneration?
Cohort (n=68)
No
Does a standardized transfemoral valve-in-valve TAVI strategy (incorporating surgical valve fracture when appropriate) provide safe procedural outcomes and durable 1-year hemodynamics in patients with symptomatic structural valve degeneration?
In patients undergoing valve-in-valve TAVI for degenerated surgical bioprostheses, a smaller surgical valve true internal diameter significantly predicts elevated 1-year transvalvular gradients (≥10 mmHg), a risk that is effectively mitigated by performing surgical valve fracture in small valves (≤21 mm).
Smaller surgical valves may increase elevated-gradient risk after ViV TAVI; supports targeted fracture but leaves open randomized confirmation of durability.
Background Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the preferred therapy for degenerated surgical bioprostheses, yet residual gradients, patient–prosthesis mismatch (PPM), and coronary obstruction remain major concerns. Purpose This study aims to assess procedural safety and mid-to-long term outcomes in a prospective ViV TAVI cohort. Methods This is a prospective single-center cohort of consecutive patients with symptomatic structural valve degeneration (NYHA III–IV) undergoing transfemoral ViV TAVI between July 2022 and June 2025. Outcomes followed VARC-3 definitions with echocardiography at discharge, 30 days, and 1 year. Exploratory modeling examined predictors of elevated 1-year gradients and PPM. Results Sixty-eight patients (51% female; mean age 77 ± 7 years; EuroSCORE II 7.3 ± 1.8%) were treated. Failure mechanism was stenosis in 50%, regurgitation 22%, mixed 28%; mean true ID 22 ± 3 mm, with 35% ≤21 mm. Valve fracture was performed in 24% (n=16). Commissural alignment was successful in 98.5%. Coronary protection was used in 11.8% (n=8); chimney stenting in 5.9% (n=4), all preserving flow. Technical success was 100%. Thirty-day outcomes: mortality 0%, stroke 0%, MI 0%, new pacemaker 2.9%, major vascular complication 1.5%. Mean transvalvular gradient decreased from 38.0 ± 9.5 mmHg to 6.6 ± 2.0 mmHg post-procedure (p<0.001), was 7.4 ± 2.3 mmHg at 30 days, and 8.2 ± 2.4 mmHg at 1 year. Aortic valve area increased from 0.80 ± 0.23 cm² to 2.00 ± 0.18 cm² (p<0.001), measuring 1.92 ± 0.20 cm² at 30 days and 1.88 ± 0.22 cm² at 1 year. At 1 year, 23.5% (16/68) had gradients ≥10 mmHg. Each 1 mm decrease in true ID increased odds of a 1-year gradient ≥10 mmHg (adjusted OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.04–1.76; p=0.03). In small valves (≤21 mm), gradients were higher (9.0 ± 2.5 vs 7.6 ± 2.2 mmHg; p=0.01) and ≥10 mmHg more frequent (38% vs 14%; p=0.01); valve fracture reduced this risk (21% vs 50%; p=0.04). Moderate/severe PPM at 1 year occurred in 7.4% overall. At median follow-up of 12.8 months, survival was 95.6%, HF hospitalization 4.4%, and no endocarditis, valve thrombosis, or reintervention. NYHA I–II was achieved in 94.1% (0% at baseline). Post-ViV coronary angiography/PCI was feasible in all attempted cases (20/20). Conclusions In this prospective single-center study, a standardized ViV TAVI strategy achieved high technical success, favorable safety, and durable hemodynamics. Smaller true ID was the main predictor of elevated 1-year gradients, while surgical valve fracture mitigated this risk in small valves. Universal coronary access preservation and marked functional improvement reinforce the value of anatomy-driven planning and contemporary device selection in the modern ViV TAVI era.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papadopoulos et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic structural surgical bioprosthetic valve degeneration (NYHA III-IV) (n=68). Smaller surgical bioprosthesis true internal diameter (per 1 mm decrease) and surgical valve fracture in ViV TAVI vs. Larger true internal diameter (>21 mm) or no valve fracture was evaluated on 1-year mean transvalvular gradient >=10 mmHg (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04-1.76, p=0.03). Each 1 mm decrease in surgical valve true ID increased the odds of 1-year gradient ≥10 mmHg after ViV TAVI (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04–1.76; p=0.03), while valve fracture reduced this risk (21% vs 50%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: