Key result
HTAD is linked to ~58% pre-dissection root phenotype prevalence, exceeding BAV and controls.
Why the study?
Aortic diameters measured during acute aortic dissection overestimate true pre-dissection size due to acute expansion, motivating the estimation of pre-dissection diameters across aortic phenotypes and underlying conditions.
Observational (n=2,122)
In acute aortic dissection, the root phenotype is predominant before dissection in patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease (HTAD) and represents about 40% of BAV and non-HTAD/non-BAV patients, with HTAD patients showing the largest estimated pre-dissection dimensions.
Background/Introduction Aortic diameters measured at the time of acute aortic dissection (AAD) overestimate true pre-dissection diameters due to acute aortic expansion. Rylski et al. (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014) quantified diameter increase during dissection, allowing estimation of pre-dissection aortic size. Purpose To report estimated pre-dissection aortic diameters according to aortic phenotype and underlying condition in patients from the IRAD registry: heritable thoracic aortic disease (HTAD), bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), and patients without HTAD or BAV. Methods Patients with AAD enrolled in the IRAD registry were included. Pre-dissection diameters were estimated by applying correction factors proposed by Rylski et al. Patients were categorized into three groups: HTAD, BAV, and others (no HTAD/BAV). Aortic phenotype was defined according to the location of maximal pre-dissection aortic diameter (root, ascending aorta, descending aorta, or sinotubular junction). Results Repartition of the population according to the maximum pre-dissection aortic diameter location:: 71 patients presented a BAV, 81 had an HTAD, and 1970 had none. Root phenotype was present in 41.0% of the patients with BAV, 57.9% of the patients with HTAD, and 42.4% of the patients without BAV or HTAD. The larger diameter was measured at STJ in 8.1% of the patients with BAV, 6.4% of the patients with HTAD, and 5.9% of the patients without BAV or HTAD Ascending phenotype was present in 49.1% of the patients with BAV, 31.4% of the patients with HTAD, and 44.6% of the patients without BAV or HTAD The larger diameter was measured at the descending aorta in 41.0% of the patients with BAV, 57.9% of the patients with HTAD, and 42.4% of the patients without BAV or HTADComparison of root phenotype with ascending phenotype population:: Figure 1Estimated diameter prior to dissection as a function of maximal predissection diameter localisation: Figure 2 Conclusion(s) The root phenotype is predominant before aortic dissection in HTAD and represents approximately 40% of BAV and non-HTAD/non-BAV patients. Estimated pre-dissection diameters are larger in BAV and HTAD patients compared with patients without these conditions whichever phenotype (root or ascending), with HTAD patients demonstrating the greatest estimated pre-dissection aortic dimensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jondeau et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute aortic dissection (AAD) (n=2,122). Heritable thoracic aortic disease (HTAD) or bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) vs. Patients without HTAD or BAV was evaluated on Root phenotype prevalence based on estimated maximal pre-dissection aortic diameter. Heritable thoracic aortic disease had a 57.9% root phenotype prevalence prior to dissection vs 41.0% in BAV and 42.4% in patients with neither.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: