Key result
Aortic length and volume yielded higher positive predictive values for predicting Type A aortic dissection (70% and 55%, respectively) compared to maximal aortic diameter (20%).
Cohort (n=552)
Absolute Event Rate: 70% vs 20%
This editorial highlights that aortic length and volume may be better predictors of aortic dissection risk than diameter alone, while also summarizing recent advances in cardiogenetics and mitral valve imaging.
In patients at risk of ascending aortic dissection, timing of surgery typically is based on serial imaging measurements of aortic diameter. Clearly, the risk of dissection in an individual patient is higher at larger aortic diameters. Even so, from a population point-of-view, most acute dissections occur in patients with a diameter below the recommended threshold for prophylactic root replacement. In this issue of Heart , Heuts and colleagues1 evaluated the hypothesis that measures of aortic length and volume would be better predictors of the risk of dissection than diameter alone. (figure 1) In an observation cohort study of 477 consecutive patients with a Type A aortic dissection, 96% did not meet the surgical diameter threshold of 55 mm before dissection onset. Compared with a cohort 75 patients with an aortic aneurysm who did not suffer a dissection, the positive predictive values of aortic measurements for prediction of dissection were 20% for maximal aortic diameter, 55% for aortic volume and 70% for aortic length. Figure 1 Methodology of the three different aortic measurements in a patient with TAA and a patient with pre-ATAAD.(A–C) demonstrate aortic measurements in a patient with TAA. panel a depicts a stretched view of the curved planar CT reconstruction with diameter measurement perpendicular to the centreline. the two right …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catherine M Otto (2020) conducted a cohort in Type A aortic dissection (n=552). Aortic length and volume measurements vs. Maximal aortic diameter was evaluated on Positive predictive value for prediction of dissection. Aortic length and volume yielded higher positive predictive values for predicting Type A aortic dissection (70% and 55%, respectively) compared to maximal aortic diameter (20%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: