Key result
Adding genetic risk to CHA2DS2-VASc links to ~80% higher post-ablation stroke risk per SD.
Why the study?
Patients remain at residual risk of ischemic stroke after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation, and the genetic basis of post-ablation stroke and incremental predictive value of a genetic risk score beyond CHA2DS2-VASc were unclear.
Does incorporating a genetic risk score into the CHA2DS2-VASc score improve the prediction of ischemic stroke in patients after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=4,960)
Yes
Does incorporating a genetic risk score into the CHA2DS2-VASc score improve the prediction of ischemic stroke in patients after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation?
Adding a 5-loci genetic risk score to the traditional CHA2DS2-VASc score significantly improves ischemic stroke risk prediction after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation, particularly identifying high-risk individuals among those with a baseline CHA2DS2-VASc score <2.
May refine post-ablation stroke risk stratification; leaves open whether GRS integration changes decisions or outcomes.
Backgroud and Aims Although atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA) can reduce the risk of ischemic stroke (IS), patients remain at residual risk. The genetic basis of post-AFCA IS is unclear. We investigated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with post-AFCA IS and evaluated whether incorporating a genetic risk score (GRS) provides incremental predictive value beyond CHA2DS2-VASc scores in two independent cohorts. Methods We developed and validated a GRS-enhanced CHA2DS2-VASc model for predicting post-AFCA IS using the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort (n=2,063) and the independent Yonsei Atrial Fibrillation Ablation (YAF) cohort (n=2,897), excluding procedure-related IS (<14 days post-ablation). We created a CHA2DS2-VASc-G score by adding one point to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with high genetic risk (defined as GRS ≥ 1.025, derived from the Youden index). We evaluated the performance and clinical utility of the CHA2DS2-VASc+GRS model. Results Over a mean follow-up of 5.5 years in the UKB cohort and 5.1 years in the YAF cohort, 46 and 48 patients experienced post-AFCA IS, corresponding to incidence rates of 0.40 and 0.33 per 100 person-years, respectively. Five genomic loci (SMARCC1, FGF10, RUNX1T1, HEMGN, VAC14) were significantly associated with post-AFCA IS and replicated in both cohorts. The GRS was higher in patients with IS (1.9±2.2 vs. 0.3±0.7, p<0.001; hazard ratio 1.80 per 1 SD, [95% CI, 1.63-1.99]). The CHA2DS2-VASc+GRS model demonstrated superior discrimination (C statistic, 0.754 vs. 0.599; p < 0.001) and improved net reclassification (net reclassification index, 21%; 95% CI, 3.3%–37.5%) compared with the CHA2DS2-VASc model alone. During long-term follow-up, the incidence of post-AFCA IS remained high in high-risk patients classified by the CHA2DS2-VASc-G score (≥2; log-rank p < 0.001) compared with low-risk patients, in contrast to patients classified by the CHA2DS2-VASc score alone. Among patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score <2, the incidence rate of post-AFCA ischemic stroke was higher in those classified as having genetic risk by the CHA2DS2-VASc-G score than in those without genetic risk (0.59 vs. 0.14 per 100 person-years; incidence rate ratio, 4.28; p<0.001). Conclusions Incorporating GRS into the CHA2DS2-VASc score significantly improved the prediction of IS after AFCA compared with the CHA2DS2-VASc score alone. The CHA2DS2-VASc-G score identified high-risk patients for post-AFCA IS among those with a CHA2DS2-VASc score <2.Performance of modelsCumulative incidence of post-AFCA IS
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation (n=4,960). Genetic risk score (GRS) and CHA2DS2-VASc+GRS model vs. CHA2DS2-VASc score alone was evaluated on Post-atrial fibrillation catheter ablation ischemic stroke (HR 1.80 per 1 SD, 95% CI 1.63-1.99, p=<0.001). Adding a genetic risk score to CHA2DS2-VASc improved post-ablation stroke prediction (C-statistic 0.754 vs 0.599, p<0.001; HR 1.80 per SD, 95% CI 1.63-1.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: