Key result
Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion with ablation cuts atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence ~21% vs ablation alone.
Why the study?
Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation for AF remains clinically significant. While ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall may enhance mitral isthmus bidirectional block and reduce arrhythmia recurrence, its adjunctive role required robust synthesis.
Does ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (EIVoM) as an adjunct to catheter ablation reduce atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and improve mitral isthmus bidirectional block in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Meta-Analysis (n=927)
Randomized controlled trials included
Does ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (EIVoM) as an adjunct to catheter ablation reduce atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and improve mitral isthmus bidirectional block in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Adjunctive ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall significantly reduces atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and repeat ablation rates while improving mitral isthmus block in persistent atrial fibrillation, albeit with an increased risk of subacute pericardial effusion.
Adjunctive EIVoM reduces recurrence and repeat ablation in persistent AF; reinforces pooled RCT evidence while noting pericardial effusion risk.
Background Atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains clinically significant. Ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (EIVoM) may enhance mitral isthmus bidirectional block (MIBB) and reduce arrhythmia recurrence but its adjunctive role requires robust synthesis. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library from inception up to May 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing EIVoM plus catheter ablation versus ablation alone in AF patients. Primary outcomes were ATa recurrence (>30 seconds after 3-month blanking), MIBB, repeat ablation, subacute pericardial effusion (not requiring drainage) and pseudoaneurysm. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed via I² and ꭓ2 statistics. Risk of bias was assessed using Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool, analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4. Results This meta-analysis of 3 RCTs involving 927 patients (476 in adjunctive EIVoM + ablation group, 451 in ablation alone group) with atrial fibrillation with mean left atrial diameter 46.7 ± 1.8 mm. The mean age of the patients was 64. 3± 2.1 years. Adjunctive EIVoM significantly reduced atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.68–0.91; P = 0.001), increased mitral isthmus bidirectional block rates (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.11–1.57; P = 0.001) and lowered repeat ablation requirements (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.44–0.96; P = 0.03) compared to ablation alone. However, EIVoM was associated with a higher risk of subacute pericardial effusion (RR 2.21, 95% CI 1.07–4.58; P = 0.03), while pseudoaneurysm incidence showed no significant intergroup difference (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.06–3.48; P = 0.44). Conclusion Adjunctive vein of Marshall ethanol infusion enhances the effectiveness of catheter ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation by significantly reducing arrhythmia recurrence and repeat procedures, while improving mitral isthmus block rates. Despite a modest increase in subacute pericardial effusion, its overall benefits position EIVoM as a promising strategy to optimise ablation outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malik et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=927). Ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (EIVoM) plus catheter ablation vs. Catheter ablation alone was evaluated on Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (>30 seconds after 3-month blanking) (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.91, p=0.001). Adjunctive vein of Marshall ethanol infusion plus catheter ablation significantly reduced atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence vs ablation alone (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.68-0.91; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: