Why the study?
Catheter ablation for AF can have limited efficacy, and the autonomic innervation of the vein of Marshall makes it an attractive adjunctive target.
Does adjunctive vein of Marshall ethanol infusion reduce late atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia recurrence in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Does adjunctive vein of Marshall ethanol infusion reduce late atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia recurrence in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Adjunctive vein of Marshall ethanol infusion during AF ablation significantly reduces late AF/AT recurrence and improves acute mitral isthmus block without increasing procedural complications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support adjunctive VOM-EI in AF ablation; confirms reduced late recurrence across pooled studies.
INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be associated with limited efficacy. Due to its autonomic innervation, the vein of Marshall (VOM) is an attractive target during AF ablation. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive ethanol infusion of VOM (VOM-EI) in AF ablation. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of VOM-EI in AF ablation compared to AF catheter ablation alone. The primary outcome of interest was late (≥3 months) AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. The secondary outcomes included acute mitral isthmus bidirectional block (MIBB) and procedural complications (pericardial effusion, stroke, or atrio-esophageal fistula). Pooled relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of four studies, including 804 AF patients (68.2% with persistent AF, the mean age of 63.5±9.9 years, 401 patients underwent VOM-EI plus CA vs. 403 patients who had CA alone), were included in the final analysis. VOM-EI group was associated with a lower risk of late AF/AT recurrence (RR:0.63; 95% CI:0.46-0.87; P = 0.005), and increased probability to achieve acute MIBB (RR:1.39; 95% CI:1.08-1.79; P = 0.009) without an increase in procedural complications (RR:1.05; 95% CI:0.57-1.94; P = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that adjunctive VOM-EI strategy is more effective than conventional catheter ablation with similar safety profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2020 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: