Key result
Abnormal resting or stress LAVI is linked to ~82% higher mortality in chronic coronary syndrome.
Why the study?
The left atrial volume index is a prognostic marker in chronic coronary syndromes, and excess dilation during stress indicates left ventricular diastolic and systolic dysfunction. This study sought to assess the prognostic value of dilated left atrial volume at rest and during stress echocardiography.
Does assessing resting and stress left atrial volume index (LAVI) during stress echocardiography predict all-cause mortality in patients with known or suspected chronic coronary syndrome?
Observational (n=8,458)
Yes
Does assessing resting and stress left atrial volume index (LAVI) during stress echocardiography predict all-cause mortality in patients with known or suspected chronic coronary syndrome?
In patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing stress echocardiography, abnormal resting and/or stress left atrial volume index is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and refines risk stratification alongside inducible regional wall motion abnormalities.
May aid mortality risk stratification alongside RWMA during stress echo; leaves open whether integration improves outcomes in chronic coronary syndrome.
Background The left atrial volume index (LAVI) acts as a barometer of the heart and a prognostic marker in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). An excess dilation during stress is an ancillary marker of left ventricular diastolic and systolic dysfunction. Aim This study sought to assess the prognostic value of dilated LA volume at rest and during stress. Methods In a prospective, multicenter, observational study design, we enrolled 8458 patients [age = 64± 12 years; 60% male] with known or suspected CCS. All patients underwent stress echocardiography (SE) with exercise (n=3771, 59.3%), dobutamine (n=776, 12.2%), or vasodilators (n=1811, 28.5%). We assessed regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) and LAVI at rest and peak stress in all patients. LAVI ≥34 ml/m2 at rest or increase ≥20% of baseline during stress was considered abnormal. The outcome measure was all-cause death. Results LAVI at peak stress was feasible in 6358 (75.2%), higher with vasodilators (1811/1973: 91.8%), and lower with exercise (3771/5081, 74.2%) and dobutamine (776/1398, 55.5%). LAVI rest was abnormal in 2353 patients (27.8%) and LAVI stress in 818 patients (12.9%). Induced RWMA were present in 935 patients (14.7%), and were less prevalent in patients with normal rest and stress LAVI (Group 1, 473/3958, 12.0%) compared to those with abnormal LAVI at rest and/or stress (Group 2, 462/2400, 19.3%, p<0.001). Follow-up data were obtained in 3541 patients. During a median follow-up of 20 months, 86 all-cause deaths (2.4%) occurred. The death rate among 100 persons/year was higher in patients with abnormal LAVI response (Group 1= 0.58% vs. Group 2= 1.80%, p<0.001): Figure 1. In multivariable analysis, abnormal resting and/or stress LAVI was independently associated with mortality (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.17-2.85; p=0.008), together with inducible RMWA (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.04-3.13; p=0.036), resting ejection fraction (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.97; p<0.001), and age (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04; p=0.047). The death rate among 100 persons/year was lowest in LAVI-/RWMA- (0.53 deaths per 100 p-yrs), intermediate in LAVI-/RWMA+ and LAVI-/RWMA+, and highest in LAVI+/RWMA+ (3.91 deaths per 100 p-years, p<0.001): Figure 2. Conclusions In CCS, rest and stress LA dilation during SE help refine survival prediction provided by inducible RWMA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cipollone et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Chronic coronary syndromes (n=8,458). Abnormal left atrial volume index (LAVI >=34 ml/m2 at rest or >=20% increase during stress) vs. Normal resting and stress left atrial volume index was evaluated on All-cause death (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.17-2.85, p=0.008). Abnormal resting and/or stress LAVI during stress echocardiography independently predicted all-cause mortality in chronic coronary syndrome (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.17-2.85; p=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Coronary artery diseaseMore from European Heart Journal