Key result
TTE-guided ASD closure is linked to ~47-minute shorter procedure times than TOE guidance.
Why the study?
Standard transoesophageal echocardiography guidance for secundum ASD closure requires general anaesthesia, increasing cost, procedural and hospital stays, and complication risks. While transthoracic echocardiography has shown comparable efficacy in pediatric patients, its safety and efficacy in an all-comer adult and pediatric population irrespective of age, weight, and defect size needed evaluation.
Does transthoracic echocardiography-guided transcatheter device closure without general anesthesia improve procedural efficiency and maintain safety compared to transesophageal echocardiography-guided closure in adult and pediatric patients with secundum atrial septal defect?
Observational (n=696)
No
Does transthoracic echocardiography-guided transcatheter device closure without general anesthesia improve procedural efficiency and maintain safety compared to transesophageal echocardiography-guided closure in adult and pediatric patients with secundum atrial septal defect?
Transthoracic echocardiography-guided transcatheter closure of secundum ASD without general anesthesia is safe and feasible in both adults and children, achieving a 97.7% success rate while significantly reducing procedural time, ICU stay, and hospital stay compared to transesophageal echocardiography guidance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports TTE-guided ASD closure without anesthesia in selected patients; extends observational data but leaves randomized confirmation open.
Background Transcatheter device closure is the preferred therapeutic option for secundum ASDs. Standard practice of utilizing transoesophageal echocardiography guidance, requires general anaesthesia which increases the cost, procedural duration, ICU stay, total hospital stays at risk of oesophageal injury and complications of GA. Transthoracic echocardiography is an excellent alternative with comparable efficacy as shown by many studies in pediatric population. Objective To assess and analyze the safety and efficacy of TTE-guided device closure of OS-ASD in all comer population irrespective of age, weight, defect size. Methods Patients who underwent device closure between March 2017-December 2025 were enrolled. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia (adults) and conscious sedation (children). Device was placed under fluoroscopy guidance, position confirmed on TTE. Procedural success, device: defect ratio, procedural time, fluoroscopy time, complications, ICU/hospital stay duration were analyzed and compared with our own experience of 125 patients of TEE-guided ASD closure (practiced before 2017). Results 571 patients underwent TTE-guided device closure. Procedure success was 97.7% with acceptable risk of major complications. Six (1.1%) had embolization into pulmonary artery, successfully operated surgically. Two (0.35%) had tamponade requiring drainage. In 15 (2.6%) patients, device could not be deployed despite multiple attempts and approaches. All unsuccessful procedures had a defect size of > 34mm and deficient IVC rim along with another short (other than aortic) rim. Findings were compared with our own previous experience of TOE guided closure (practised before 2017). Compared to TOE group, TTE group had significantly lower total procedural duration (75 ± 4 vs. 28.2 ± 2.5 min; p < 0.01), intensive care unit stay (24 ± 10 vs. 16.7± 3.1h; p < 0.01), and hospital (48±12 vs. 37.4± 3.5h; p < 0.01) stay duration. Fluoroscopic time was similar in both. There was no mortality in either group. Major complications were comparable, TTE-guided group had less post-procedure complications of vomiting and headache. Additional findings of less pre-procedure fasting duration and early commencement of post procedure oral intake were noted in TTE group. Conclusion TTE-guided device closure of OS-ASD is safe and feasible in all-comer population in experienced hands. It can negate the use of TEE in most unless poor echo’ window. It reduces the procedural duration; hospital stay and total cost apart from complications of GA/TOE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naganur et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Secundum atrial septal defect (OS-ASD) (n=696). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)-guided transcatheter device closure under local anesthesia or conscious sedation vs. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided transcatheter device closure under general anesthesia was evaluated on Procedural success and total procedural duration (p=<0.01). TTE-guided ASD closure achieved 97.7% procedural success and reduced procedural duration (28.2 vs 75 min; p<0.01) and hospital stay (37.4 vs 48 h; p<0.01) vs TOE guidance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: