Key result
Higher BIA phase angle linked to ~4.6-fold higher odds of achieving target exercise stress workload.
Why the study?
Determining the optimal initial workload and predicting maximal exercise load during exercise stress echocardiography remain significant clinical challenges in frail or elderly patients. This study investigated whether bioelectrical impedance analysis-derived phase angle could predict exercise capacity beyond conventional body composition measures.
Does bioelectrical impedance analysis-derived phase angle predict maximal exercise load and exercise capacity during exercise stress echocardiography in patients referred primarily for valvular heart disease evaluation?
Observational (n=240)
No
Does bioelectrical impedance analysis-derived phase angle predict maximal exercise load and exercise capacity during exercise stress echocardiography in patients referred primarily for valvular heart disease evaluation?
Bioelectrical impedance analysis-derived phase angle independently predicts maximal exercise load during exercise stress echocardiography, offering an objective tool to tailor stress protocols in elderly or frail patients.
Phase angle may aid ESE workload prediction in valvular patients; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Background/Introduction With the progressive ageing of the population, the prevalence of heart failure and valvular heart disease continues to increase. Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) plays a pivotal role in functional assessment; however, in frail or elderly patients, reduced physical performance often limits the ability to apply appropriate exercise load. Consequently, determining the optimal initial workload and predicting maximal exercise load (MEL) remain significant clinical challenges. Purpose We sought to investigate whether bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)–derived parameters, particularly phase angle (PhA), a novel marker reflecting cellular integrity and muscle quality, could predict exercise capacity during ESE beyond conventional body composition measures. Methods Between April 2023 and December 2025, 271 consecutive patients underwent ESE at our Medical University. Among them, 240 patients without implanted cardiac devices and eligible for BIA assessment were included in the analysis. Associations between MEL, achievement of ≥25 W and ≥50 W, and BIA-derived parameters were examined using correlation and multivariable regression analyses. Results The mean age was 69.9 years, and 43% were female. The median Clinical Frailty Scale score was 3. More than 90% of ESE referrals were for evaluation of valvular heart disease. Mean skeletal muscle mass, bone mineral content, body fat mass, and PhA were 39.2 ± 7.8 kg, 2.4 ± 0.4 kg, 14.6 ± 6.1 kg, and 4.62 ± 0.82, respectively. PhA correlated negatively with age and BNP levels (r = −0.57 and −0.58, both p < 0.0001), and positively with skeletal muscle mass and handgrip strength (r = 0.56 and 0.67, both p < 0.0001). Notably, PhA demonstrated a strong positive correlation with MEL (r = 0.72, p < 0.0001). In multivariable linear regression adjusted for age, skeletal muscle mass, body fat mass, and BNP, PhA remained an independent predictor of MEL (t = 3.60, p = 0.0004). Furthermore, multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that PhA independently predicted achieving ≥25 W and ≥50 W during ESE, irrespective of age, skeletal muscle mass, body fat mass, and BNP (≥25 W: OR 4.57, p = 0.016; ≥50 W: OR 2.61, p = 0.015). Conclusion BIA-derived PhA may serve as a practical and objective tool for estimating appropriate exercise load prior to ESE, potentially facilitating individualized stress protocols in an ageing cardiovascular population.Fig 1Fig 2
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mochizuki et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular patients undergoing exercise stress echocardiography (predominantly valvular heart disease) (n=240). Bioelectrical impedance analysis-derived phase angle (PhA) was evaluated on Maximal exercise load (MEL) and achievement of ≥25 W and ≥50 W during exercise stress echocardiography (OR 4.57 (for ≥25 W); OR 2.61 (for ≥50 W); r = 0.72 (for MEL), p=0.016 (≥25 W); 0.015 (≥50 W); <0.0001 (MEL correlation)). Bioelectrical impedance analysis-derived phase angle correlated with maximal exercise load (r=0.72, p<0.0001) and predicted achieving ≥25 W (OR 4.57, p=0.016) and ≥50 W (OR 2.61, p=0.015) during ESE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: