Key result
Persistent AF is linked to ~29% higher odds of in-hospital ischaemic stroke versus paroxysmal AF.
Why the study?
AF subtype may reflect differences in arrhythmia burden and atrial remodelling, but whether persistent AF confers a greater in-hospital stroke risk compared with paroxysmal AF remained uncertain.
Does persistent atrial fibrillation increase the risk of in-hospital ischaemic and embolic stroke compared with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in hospitalised adults?
Cohort (n=72,901)
Yes
Does persistent atrial fibrillation increase the risk of in-hospital ischaemic and embolic stroke compared with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in hospitalised adults?
In hospitalised adults with atrial fibrillation, persistent AF is independently associated with a higher risk of in-hospital ischaemic and embolic stroke and prolonged length of stay compared to paroxysmal AF, without increasing in-hospital mortality.
May warrant closer in-hospital stroke monitoring for persistent AF; leaves open whether rhythm control or intensified anticoagulation modifies risk.
Background/Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for thromboembolic events, particularly ischaemic stroke. AF subtype may reflect differences in arrhythmia burden and atrial remodelling; however, whether persistent AF confers a greater in-hospital stroke risk compared with paroxysmal AF remains uncertain. Purpose To compare the risk of in-hospital ischaemic and embolic stroke between persistent and paroxysmal AF, and to evaluate in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the United States National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2018 to 2021. Adult hospitalisations with paroxysmal (ICD-10 code I48.0) or persistent (ICD-10 code I48.1) AF were identified. Primary outcomes were ischaemic stroke (ICD-10 code I63) and embolic stroke (ICD-10 codes I63.1 and I63.4). Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and LOS. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent association between AF subtype and stroke outcomes, adjusting for demographic and clinically relevant cardiovascular and systemic comorbidities. LOS was analysed using linear regression after log transformation (ln[LOS+1]). Results A total of 72,901 AF hospitalisations were identified, of which 20,763 (28.5%) were persistent. Ischaemic stroke occurred in 443 patients (0.6%) and embolic stroke in 166 (0.2%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 1.6%. Persistent AF was independently associated with higher odds of ischaemic stroke compared with paroxysmal AF (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.05–1.58; p=0.014) and demonstrated a stronger association with embolic stroke (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.21–2.29; p=0.002). Persistent AF was not independently associated with an increase in in-hospital mortality. In linear regression analysis, persistent AF was associated with longer LOS. After log transformation, persistent AF remained independently associated with prolonged hospitalisation (β 0.094; p<0.001), corresponding to an approximate 9–10% increase in LOS compared with paroxysmal AF. Conclusions Persistent AF is independently associated with increased risk of in-hospital ischaemic and embolic stroke compared with paroxysmal AF, with a stronger association observed for embolic stroke. Persistent AF is also associated with prolonged hospitalisation. These findings highlight the prognostic importance of AF subtype and may support more intensive risk stratification strategies in patients with persistent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gracidas-Carrion et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=72,901). Persistent atrial fibrillation vs. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was evaluated on In-hospital ischaemic stroke (ICD-10 code I63) and embolic stroke (ICD-10 codes I63.1 and I63.4) (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.58, p=0.014). Persistent AF was independently associated with higher odds of in-hospital ischaemic stroke (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.05-1.58; p=0.014) and embolic stroke (OR 1.67; p=0.002) versus paroxysmal AF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: