Key result
Micra leadless pacemakers achieve 100% implant success with stable 10-year thresholds and no infections.
Why the study?
Although feasibility, implantation safety, and acute success of the Micra leadless intracardiac pacing system were proven in controlled studies, long-term real-life single-center follow-up data of up to ten years compared with controlled prospective trial data were needed.
Does leadless intracardiac pacemaker implantation provide safe implantation and stable long-term electrical parameters over up to 10 years in a real-life clinical cohort?
Observational (n=412)
No
Does leadless intracardiac pacemaker implantation provide safe implantation and stable long-term electrical parameters over up to 10 years in a real-life clinical cohort?
Real-world 10-year follow-up of leadless pacemaker implantation confirms a 100% acute success rate, low major complication rate, absence of long-term infections or system failures, and stable electrical parameters comparable to prospective trial data.
Supports long-term stability of leadless pacemakers in real-world cohort; extends trial data but leaves practice change to randomized studies.
Introduction The Micra™ leadless intracardiac pacing system has been introduced and implemented into clinical routine in 2015, with its next generation MICRA AV ™ in 2020. Feasibility, implantation safety, and acute success have been proven in the setting of controlled studies. Even apart from controlled studies, this leadless pacemaker technology iss beneficial for the individual patient. We aim to report our single center follow-up (FU) data with a follow-up of up to sten years. Methods In 412 patients (188 men; age: 81±5,7 y), Micra™ implantation was performed. Pacemaker interrogation was performed one to seven days after implantation and during FU (1; 3; 6, then every 6 month) up to 120 months. Data were assessed in a real-life setting and compared with existing data of a controlled prospective trial. Results The implantation was successful in all 412 attempts with only two pericardial effusion as major complication, which needed pericardiocentesis, two complications with the groin which required operation. During follow up there were three patients developing severe heart failure symptoms resulting in an implantation of a CRT-device and switching of the leadless pacemaker system. One device had to be changed because of early unacceptable increase in threshold. The average acute thresholds, sensing and impedance after system release were: 0.56±0.36V@0.24ms; 10,1 ± 6,14mV and 754±1 196 Ohm. During follow up of up to 10 years neither, pacemaker failure, nor infections were reported. Measurements were reevaluated for long-term thresholds, sensing and impedance: 0.75 ± 0.38V @ 0.24 ms; 18,38 ±2,75 mV and 525 ± 102 Ohm. During 10 years, in average no significant changes from acute to long-term measurements were detectable. In comparison to the controlled trial, our measurements of this real-life cohort were very similar. Conclusion In a real-life setting, the implantation of the leadless Micra™ system demonstrates a high rate of implantation success without major complications. We were also able to show stable long-term system parameters in the clinical setting of up to ten years of follow up with a very good battery longevity of about 12,0 years. Treshold Study vs. Paper
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winter et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Patients requiring intracardiac pacing (n=412). Micra™ leadless intracardiac pacing system vs. Existing data of a controlled prospective trial was evaluated on Implantation success, complications, and long-term pacing system parameters (thresholds, sensing, impedance). Micra™ leadless pacemaker implantation achieved 100% success in 412 patients with stable 10-year pacing thresholds (0.75±0.38V) and no device failures or infections.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Heart failureMore from European Heart Journal