Key result
Admission hs-cTnI shows moderate diagnostic accuracy for occlusive MI with an AUC of ~0.74.
Why the study?
A binary approach to hs-cTn elevation in ACS treats all elevations similarly, potentially leading to unnecessary procedures for minor elevations while failing to identify patients with occlusive MI requiring emergent catheterisation. Whether admission hs-cTnI magnitude and early dynamics can predict occlusive MI and critical coronary lesions needed evaluation.
Does admission high-sensitivity troponin I magnitude and early dynamics predict occlusive myocardial infarction and critical coronary lesions in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=396)
No
Does admission high-sensitivity troponin I magnitude and early dynamics predict occlusive myocardial infarction and critical coronary lesions in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Quantifying the magnitude and early absolute change of hs-cTnI provides moderate predictive accuracy for identifying acute coronary occlusion and critical coronary lesions, potentially helping refine the timing of invasive angiography in AMI.
Admission hs-cTnI should not yet guide angiography timing in AMI; hypothesis-generating for occlusive lesion prediction, requiring prospective validation.
Background In acute coronary syndromes (ACS), high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn) elevation prompts an early (<24h) invasive strategy1. However, this binary approach treats all elevations similarly, potentially leading to unnecessary procedures for minor elevations while failing to identify patients with very high hs-cTn who may have an underlying occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) and require emergent catheterisation2. We hypothesised that hs-cTnI magnitude could refine risk stratification, as previously demonstrated for hs-cTnT 3. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of admission hs-cTnI and its early dynamics in predicting OMI and critical coronary lesions in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods Single-centre retrospective cohort of 396 consecutive AMI patients who underwent coronary angiography within 7 days (September 2024–August 2025). hs-cTnI was measured using a high-sensitivity troponin I assay (99th percentile URL 11 ng/L). Two primary endpoints were assessed: OMI(TIMI flow 0–1 in culprit artery) and Critical Lesion (CL: TIMI flow ≤ 2, or stenosis ≥90% in epicardial vessel, or ≥70% with plaque instability features). Absolute and relative delta troponin were analysed in a subgroup with serial sampling per ESC 0/1-hour protocol 4 (n=318). ROC curves were constructed; Youden index, ≥90% sensitivity (Se) and ≥90% specificity (Sp) cut-offs were determined. Results Mean age 64.1±11.4 years; 69.2% male. OMI occurred in 23.5% and CL in 57.6%. 42.4% of AMI patients had neither CL nor OMI by angiography. Median admission hs-cTnI was significantly higher in patients with OMI (11,040 vs 495 ng/L, p<0.001) and CL (3,006 vs 307 ng/L, p<0.001). Admission hs-cTnI showed moderate accuracy for OMI (AUC 0.736; 95%CI 0.674–0.799) and CL (AUC 0.672; 95%CI 0.620–0.725). Youden-optimal cut-offs were ≥ 2,991 ng/L for OMI and ≥ 1518 ng/L for CL. A high hs-cTnI cutoff for OMI (≥ 35,050 ng/L) had 90.4% Sp and a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 3.7. For CL, a cutoff of ≥ 11,790 ng/L yielded 90.5% Sp and a LR+ of 3.56. Absolute hs-cTnI change also predicted OMI (AUC 0.725; 95%CI 0.647–0.802); notably, a change < 28.6 ng/L had 95.8% NPV for ruling out OMI (LR- 0.188). In contrast, relative (%) hs-cTnI change showed no discriminative ability for either endpoint (AUC 0.442 and 0.469). Conclusion The magnitude of hs-cTnI elevation and its early absolute change provide moderate, yet clinically valuable, predictive accuracy for acute coronary occlusion and critical coronary anatomy. Very high hs-cTnI levels can identify patients with a high probability of OMI, supporting an emergent invasive approach. Conversely, a minimal early rise in hs-cTnI could contribute to ruling out OMI, potentially allowing for safe de-escalation of care. These findings suggest that hs-cTnI quantification, beyond its current binary interpretation, may serve as an additional tool to refine invasive strategy timing in AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prata et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=396). Admission high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-cTnI) magnitude and early dynamics was evaluated on Occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI: TIMI flow 0–1 in culprit artery) and Critical Lesion (CL: TIMI flow ≤ 2, stenosis ≥90% in epicardial vessel, or ≥70% with plaque instability features) (AUC 0.736, 95% CI 0.674-0.799, p=<0.001). Admission hs-cTnI showed moderate diagnostic accuracy for occlusive MI (AUC 0.736; 95% CI 0.674–0.799) and critical coronary lesions (AUC 0.672; 95% CI 0.620–0.725).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: