Key result
Home-based inspiratory muscle training improves maximal inspiratory pressure by ~12 cmH2O over cardiac rehabilitation alone.
Why the study?
Respiratory muscle weakness drives dyspnoea and exercise intolerance in chronic heart failure, yet inspiratory muscle training remains underutilised in urban cardiac rehabilitation settings. This study evaluated the efficacy of home-based inspiratory muscle training in urban Thai patients with stable chronic heart failure.
Does home-based inspiratory muscle training added to standard cardiac rehabilitation improve respiratory muscle strength (MIP and MEP) in urban Thai patients with stable NYHA class II chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=40)
Single-blind
1:1
Does home-based inspiratory muscle training added to standard cardiac rehabilitation improve respiratory muscle strength (MIP and MEP) in urban Thai patients with stable NYHA class II chronic heart failure?
Adding 8 weeks of home-based inspiratory muscle training to standard cardiac rehabilitation safely and significantly improves maximal inspiratory pressure in urban Thai patients with stable NYHA class II chronic heart failure.
Supports adding home-based inspiratory muscle training to cardiac rehabilitation to enhance respiratory muscle strength in stable HF; extends RCT evidence to Thai NYHA II patients.
Background In chronic heart failure (CHF), respiratory muscle weakness is a key driver of dyspnoea and exercise intolerance. Despite being an independent predictor of adverse clinical outcomes, inspiratory muscle training (IMT) remains underutilised in urban cardiac rehabilitation settings. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of home-based IMT in enhancing respiratory muscle strength, functional capacity, and quality of life among urban Thai patients with stable CHF Methods This single-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 40 stable CHF patients (mean age 62.1±12.7 years; 80% male; all NYHA class II). Participants were randomised (1:1) to either 8 weeks of standard cardiac rehabilitation (CR) plus IMT (using a threshold device calibrated at 30% of maximal inspiratory pressure [MIP]) or standard CR alone. Primary outcomes were changes in MIP and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP). Secondary outcomes included 6-minute walk distance (6MWT), EQ-5D-5L, NT-proBNP, and echocardiographic parameters (LVEF, E/E′) at 5 months. Results At 8 weeks, the IMT group showed significantly greater improvement in MIP compared to controls (median change +9.7 [IQR 2.8 to 18.3] vs -2.3 [-21.3 to 10.3] cmH2O; p = 0.033). A positive trend was observed in MEP (median change +6.3 vs 0.7 cmH2O; p = 0.051) and 6MWT. At 5 months, the IMT group demonstrated a favourable shift in diastolic function (median E/E′ 10.9 vs 15.5; p = 0.059). No significant differences were found in LVEF or NT-proBNP, and no adverse events were reported. Conclusion Home-based IMT is safe and effectively enhances respiratory muscle strength and potentially improves diastolic function in urban Thai CHF patients. These findings support the strategic integration of IMT into multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation frameworks to optimise functional recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hunsakunachai et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Stable chronic heart failure (n=40). Home-based inspiratory muscle training (IMT) plus standard cardiac rehabilitation vs. Standard cardiac rehabilitation alone was evaluated on Changes in maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) at 8 weeks (p=0.033). Home-based inspiratory muscle training added to cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved maximal inspiratory pressure at 8 weeks compared with rehabilitation alone (+9.7 vs -2.3 cmH2O; p=0.033).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: