Key result
Ivabradine enables successful catecholamine withdrawal in ~77% of cardiogenic shock patients alongside hemodynamic improvements.
Why the study?
Heart rate control with ivabradine may improve ventriculo-arterial coupling and hemodynamic stability in cardiogenic shock patients with failed catecholamine weaning, but clinical data in this setting remain scarce.
Does ivabradine 5 mg twice daily improve hemodynamic parameters and facilitate catecholamine withdrawal in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock and prior catecholamine weaning failure?
Cohort (n=39)
No
Does ivabradine 5 mg twice daily improve hemodynamic parameters and facilitate catecholamine withdrawal in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock and prior catecholamine weaning failure?
In a small single-center retrospective cohort, ivabradine was associated with improved hemodynamic parameters and ventriculo-arterial coupling at 48 hours, with successful catecholamine withdrawal in 77% of cardiogenic shock patients who had failed initial weaning.
May aid weaning in refractory cardiogenic shock; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background Heart rate control may represent a key therapeutic target in cardiogenic shock (CS), particularly in patients who experience failure of catecholamine weaning. Ivabradine, a selective sinus node inhibitor, could improve ventriculo-arterial coupling and hemodynamic stability; however, clinical data in this setting remain scarce. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the Cardiology Department of our University Hospital, between July 2024 and May 2025. Thirty-nine critically ill patients with CS requiring continuous catecholamine infusion and unsuccessful initial weaning attempts received ivabradine at a dose of 5 mg twice daily. Hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and biological parameters were assessed at baseline and after 48 hours. Results The median dobutamine dose at the time of ivabradine introduction was 8 μg/kg/min. Norepinephrine was used in 64.1% of cases, with a median dose of 1 μg/min. After 48 hours, ivabradine significantly reduced heart rate (103 ± 25.5 to 84.9 ± 19.3 bpm; p < 0.001). This reduction was associated with improved stroke volume (21.98 [18.84–25.12] to 29.83 [25.12–31.40] mL; p < 0.001), increased cardiac power output (0.39 ± 0.16 to 0.46 ± 0.14 W; p = 0.001), and better ventriculo-arterial coupling (6.08 ± 3.20 to 4.5 ± 2.11; p < 0.001). Mean arterial pressure increased (+8.6 mmHg; p < 0.001), while lactate levels significantly decreased (3 [2.8–4] to 1.8 [1.5–3] mmol/L; p < 0.001). Successful catecholamine withdrawal was achieved in 77% of patients. Conclusions In this single-center retrospective study, ivabradine safely improved hemodynamic parameters and ventriculo-arterial coupling, facilitating catecholamine withdrawal in the majority of patients with cardiogenic shock and prior weaning failure. These findings support further prospective evaluation of ivabradine in this high-risk population
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haddar et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiogenic shock with catecholamine weaning failure (n=39). Ivabradine was evaluated on Successful catecholamine withdrawal and hemodynamic changes at 48 hours (p=<0.001). Ivabradine reduced heart rate (103 to 84.9 bpm; p<0.001), improved hemodynamics, and enabled successful catecholamine withdrawal in 77% of cardiogenic shock patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: