Key result
MRI-derived wall thickness standard deviation identifies ~97% of HCM cases, outperforming standard maximal thickness thresholds.
Why the study?
Current diagnostic criteria for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy rely on absolute wall thickness cut-offs that may miss early or subtle phenotypes, particularly in sarcomere mutation carriers. Whether wall thickness standard deviation improves identification of HCM and mutation carriers needed to be determined.
Does cardiac MRI-derived wall thickness standard deviation (WTSD) improve the diagnostic identification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and sarcomere mutation carriers compared to standard wall thickness thresholds?
Observational (n=941)
Does cardiac MRI-derived wall thickness standard deviation (WTSD) improve the diagnostic identification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and sarcomere mutation carriers compared to standard wall thickness thresholds?
CMR-derived wall thickness standard deviation (WTSD) accurately detects both overt hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and early-stage sarcomere mutation carriers, outperforming standard absolute and BSA-indexed wall thickness thresholds particularly in women.
WTSD may enhance CMR detection of HCM and carriers; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change diagnostic thresholds.
Background Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) shows variable left ventricular hypertrophy, yet current diagnostic criteria rely on absolute wall thickness (WT) cut-offs that may miss early or subtle phenotypes, particularly in sarcomere mutation carriers. Objectives To determine whether wall thickness standard deviation (WTSD), reflecting WT heterogeneity, improves identification of HCM and mutation carriers. Methods Cardiac magnetic resonance was performed in 382 healthy controls, 297 patients with HCM, 82 sarcomere mutation carriers without overt hypertrophy, and 180 patients with other cardiac conditions (75 with and 105 without LV hypertrophy). End-diastolic WT was measured in 16 myocardial segments, and WTSD was computed. Diagnostic performance was compared with other WT-derived parameters using age- and sex-specific thresholds. Results WTSD was higher in HCM (4.3 ± 1.1 mm) and mutation carriers (2.3 ± 0.3 mm) than in controls (1.3 ± 0.3 mm; p<0.0001). WTSD identified 97% of HCM and 64% of carriers with 99% specificity. In females, WTSD achieved 98.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity for HCM and detected 74% of carriers. WTSD outperformed demographic-based thresholds and BSA-indexed maximal WT in all subgroups. Mutation carriers showed heterogeneous remodeling with both hypertrophic and thinned segments despite normal absolute WT. WTSD was significantly higher in HCM than in all cardiac conditions with LV hypertrophy and in mutation carriers versus non-hypertrophic conditions, except post-ischemic severe LV dysfunction. Conclusions WTSD is a robust imaging biomarker that detects both overt and early sarcomeric HCM with high accuracy. Incorporating WT heterogeneity into diagnostic algorithms may enhance early identification, especially in women and mutation carriers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Licordari et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and sarcomeric gene mutation carriers (n=941). MRI-derived wall thickness standard deviation (WTSD) vs. Healthy controls and other WT-derived parameters (demographic-based thresholds and BSA-indexed maximal WT) was evaluated on Diagnostic identification of HCM and sarcomere mutation carriers using WTSD (p=<0.0001). MRI-derived wall thickness standard deviation (WTSD) identified 97% of HCM patients and 64% of sarcomere mutation carriers with 99% specificity, outperforming maximal wall thickness thresholds.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: