Key result
Residual functional SYNTAX score linked to ~71% lower odds of post-PCI angina improvement.
Why the study?
The comparative impact of anatomical residual disease (residual SYNTAX score) versus functional residual disease (residual Functional SYNTAX score) on symptom improvement after PCI remains unclear.
Does functional residual disease (rFSS) better predict symptomatic improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class after PCI compared to anatomical residual disease (rSS) in patients with at least CCS class II angina?
Observational (n=236)
No
Does functional residual disease (rFSS) better predict symptomatic improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class after PCI compared to anatomical residual disease (rSS) in patients with at least CCS class II angina?
Functional residual ischemia (assessed via QFR-derived residual Functional SYNTAX score), rather than purely anatomical residual disease, independently predicts reduced angina symptom improvement following PCI.
Functional residual SYNTAX score may better inform post-PCI angina expectations than anatomical scoring; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background/Introduction Incomplete revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is commonly assessed using the residual Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (rSS), an anatomical measure of residual coronary artery disease. The residual Functional SYNTAX score (rFSS), incorporating ischemia-producing lesions, may better reflect clinically relevant residual disease. The comparative impact of anatomical versus functional residual disease on symptom improvement remains unclear. Purpose To compare the association of anatomical residual disease (rSS) and functional residual disease (rFSS) with symptomatic improvement after PCI. Methods Consecutive patients with at least Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class II undergoing PCI between October 2018 and December 2019 at a general hospital were evaluated (n=236). Offline Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis was estimated for each patient. rSS was calculated according to the standard SYNTAX methodology to quantify the anatomical burden of residual coronary disease after PCI. The rFSS was derived by summing the individual SYNTAX scores only for residual lesions associated with ischemia, defined as vessel QFR ≤0.89. CCS improvement was defined as a reduction in CCS class at follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), and glomerular filtration rate were constructed to assess the independent association of rSS and rFSS with symptomatic improvement. Results In the anatomical model, rSS was not independently associated with CCS improvement (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.24–1.13; p=0.098), whereas EF was independently associated with symptomatic improvement (OR 1.07 per 1% increase, 95% CI 1.02–1.11; p=0.002). In the functional model, rFSS was independently associated with a reduced likelihood of CCS improvement (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09–0.88; p=0.028), while EF was no longer statistically significant. Conclusions Functional residual ischemia, but not anatomical residual disease, independently predicts reduced symptomatic improvement after PCI. These findings indicate that functional assessment of residual disease may provide additional information regarding symptomatic recovery beyond anatomical evaluation alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexiou et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with angina (n=236). Residual Functional SYNTAX score (rFSS) vs. Residual anatomical SYNTAX score (rSS) was evaluated on Symptomatic improvement (reduction in Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] angina class at follow-up) (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.88, p=0.028). Residual functional SYNTAX score independently predicted reduced likelihood of CCS angina improvement after PCI (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.88; p=0.028), unlike anatomical residual SYNTAX score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: