Key result
Mavacamten is linked to an absolute ~0.9-point reduction in estimated HCM Risk-SCD score.
Why the study?
Mavacamten reduces LVOTO and promotes reverse remodeling in obstructive HCM, but its influence on the estimated HCM Risk-SCD score, which incorporates echocardiographic parameters that may change with therapy, remained unclear.
Does mavacamten reduce the estimated HCM Risk-SCD score in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=40)
Does mavacamten reduce the estimated HCM Risk-SCD score in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Treatment with mavacamten in obstructive HCM patients significantly reduces the estimated 5-year HCM Risk-SCD score primarily by reducing LVOT obstruction, though its impact on actual sudden cardiac death incidence requires long-term validation.
Mavacamten may lower estimated SCD risk in obstructive HCM; leaves open whether this reduces actual events.
Background Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Risk stratification may be performed using the HCM Risk-SCD score, which has been validated in cohorts of patients treated with first-line medical therapy (beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers). Mavacamten, a novel selective cardiac myosin inhibitor, has been shown to reduce left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) and to promote reverse remodeling. Its influence on the estimated HCM Risk-SCD score, which incorporates echocardiographic parameters that may change with therapy, remains unclear. Objective To assess hypothetical changes in the estimated HCM Risk-SCD score in patients with obstructive HCM treated with mavacamten. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study including all patients with HCM treated with mavacamten who had been on a stable dose for at least 3 months. Clinical data and transthoracic echocardiograms were reviewed to collect maximal wall thickness (MWT), left atrial diameter (LAD), and maximal LVOTO. The HCM Risk-SCD score was calculated using the ESC online tool. Comparisons were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results Forty patients were included [58% male; median age 62 (61–71) years and follow-up 7 (3–12) months]. Echocardiographic parameters improved significantly in comparison to baseline, with reductions in maximal LVOTO [84 (68–129) vs. 5 (0–39) mmHg; p<0.001], MWT [18 (16–20) vs. 15 (14–18) mm; p<0.001], and LAD [43 (39–47) vs. 40 (36–44) mm; p=0.008]. Mavacamten was associated with a significant reduction in the HCM Risk-SCD score, decreasing from 2.4 (1.7–4.7) to 1.5 (1.1–2.6) %, corresponding to an absolute change of −0.9 (−2.0 to −0.5) % and a relative reduction of −40 (−52 to −26) % (p<0.001) (central figure). At baseline, four patients had a high estimated 5-year SCD risk (>6%) – all of whom had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. During follow-up, three were reclassified in the low-risk category (<4%), while one remained in the high-risk group. No patient transitioned into a higher risk category after treatment. Per-patient decomposition of the HCM Risk-SCD reduction showed that most of the improvement was driven by changes in LVOTO (median −0.52%), with smaller contributions from MWT (−0.29%) and LAD (−0.08%). Conclusion Mavacamten was associated with a significant reduction in the estimated HCM Risk-SCD score. Whether this improvement translates into a true reduction in the 5-year SCD incidence remains uncertain. External validation in large multicenter cohorts with long-term follow-up is required to determine whether the decrease in the hypothetical risk corresponds to reduced mortality.Central figure
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (n=40). Mavacamten vs. Baseline (pre-treatment) was evaluated on Estimated HCM Risk-SCD score (Absolute change -0.9% (relative reduction -40%), p=<0.001). Mavacamten treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the estimated HCM Risk-SCD score from 2.4% to 1.5% (absolute change −0.9%, relative reduction −40%; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: