Key result
GLP-1RA initiation shows no mortality difference over SGLT2i in obese adults with valvular heart disease.
Why the study?
GLP-1RA and SGLT2i improve cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk cardiometabolic populations, yet comparative effectiveness data in obese patients with common non-rheumatic VHD are sparse.
Does initiation of GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce 1-year all-cause mortality compared with SGLT2 inhibitors in adults with obesity and non-rheumatic valvular heart disease?
Cohort (n=18,870)
Yes
Does initiation of GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce 1-year all-cause mortality compared with SGLT2 inhibitors in adults with obesity and non-rheumatic valvular heart disease?
In obese adults with common non-rheumatic valvular heart disease, initiating a GLP-1 receptor agonist resulted in similar 1-year all-cause mortality compared to initiating an SGLT2 inhibitor, with non-significant numerical trends favoring GLP-1RAs in regurgitant lesions.
Similar mortality does not support preferring GLP-1RAs over SGLT2 inhibitors in obese valvular heart disease; leaves open need for randomized comparisons.
Background LP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) improve cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk cardiometabolic populations, yet comparative effectiveness data in valvular heart disease (VHD) are sparse. Purpose To compare 1-year all-cause mortality after initiation of GLP-1RA versus SGLT2i among adults with common non-rheumatic VHD and obesity. Methods Using a large federated electronic health record network, we emulated four parallel target trials in adults (≥18 years) with BMI ≥30 kg/m² and a diagnosis of non-rheumatic aortic stenosis, aortic insufficiency, mitral insufficiency, or tricuspid insufficiency recorded within the year before treatment start. Time zero was the first prescription of GLP-1RA (dulaglutide, liraglutide, semaglutide, or tirzepatide) or SGLT2i (canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or empagliflozin). A 365-day washout for both drug classes and exclusion of pre-index crossover were applied to approximate new users. Each VHD cohort underwent 1:1 propensity-score matching for demographics, cardiometabolic comorbidities (including diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney disease), and key cardiovascular medications. Follow-up was 365 days. Results After matching, 2,767 pairs with aortic stenosis, 1,549 pairs with aortic regurgitation, 3,493 pairs with mitral regurgitation, and 1,626 pairs with tricuspid regurgitation were analysed. One-year all-cause mortality was similar for GLP-1RA versus SGLT2i in aortic stenosis (5.9% vs 5.6%; HR 1.06; p=0.585) and mitral regurgitation (5.3% vs 5.9%; HR 0.92; p=0.388). In regurgitant lesions, GLP-1RA showed numerically lower mortality in aortic regurgitation (4.2% vs 5.6%; HR 0.77; p=0.118) and tricuspid regurgitation (6.9% vs 8.1%; HR 0.88; p=0.306), without statistical significance. Conclusions In obese adults with common non-rheumatic VHD, initiation of GLP-1RA compared with SGLT2i was not associated with higher 1-year mortality, with consistent numerical trends favouring GLP-1RA in regurgitant phenotypes. Prospective studies are needed to clarify whether incretin-based therapy confers incremental benefit in valvular populations beyond established cardiometabolic effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerniss et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Non-rheumatic valvular heart disease and obesity (n=18,870). GLP-1 receptor agonists (dulaglutide, liraglutide, semaglutide, or tirzepatide) vs. SGLT2 inhibitors (canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or empagliflozin) was evaluated on 1-year all-cause mortality (HR 1.06, p=0.585). GLP-1RA initiation yielded similar 1-year mortality vs SGLT2i in obese adults with VHD, including aortic stenosis (HR 1.06, p=0.585) and mitral regurgitation (HR 0.92, p=0.388).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: