Why the study?
Emerging data in HCM suggest important sex differences in clinical presentation, myocardial remodeling, and therapeutic management that may influence prognosis, warranting characterization of sex-related differences in clinical profile, imaging, genetics, and treatment.
Cohort (n=550)
No
Women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are diagnosed later than men despite presenting with more severe symptoms, worse diastolic function, greater LVOT obstruction, and more myocardial fibrosis, although major clinical outcomes including mortality are similar.
Introduction Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited cardiac disease with heterogeneous clinical expression and outcomes. Sex differences in phenotypic expression and outcomes are well known in several cardiovascular conditions. Emerging data in patients with HCM also suggests important sex differences in clinical presentation, myocardial remodeling, and therapeutic management that may influence patient prognosis. Purpose To characterize sex-related differences in clinical profile, imaging features, genetics, and treatment among patients with HCM followed in a dedicated tertiary center. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with a diagnosis of HCM followed at a tertiary care center up until November 2025. Data collected included demographics, NYHA class, imaging parameters, invasive and device-based therapies, treatment, genetic testing, and mortality. Comparisons between male and female patients were performed using chi-square tests for categorical variables and independent t-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests for continuous variables, as appropriate. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results Overall, 550 patients were included (mean age 62 ± 12 years; 43% female). Women were first diagnosed at a significantly older age than men (58 vs. 53 years, p = 0.019), exhibited a higher symptomatic burden (NYHA III–IV: 24% vs. 10%, p = 0.001) and NT-proBNP levels (1487 [512–3940] pg/mL vs. 571 [200–1931] pg/mL, p = 0.01). Myosin inhibitor therapy was more frequently prescribed to women (14% vs. 3%, p < 0.001). Imaging assessments revealed similar left ventricular ejection fraction and maximal wall thickness between sexes, but women had a higher prevalence of significant left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction (34% vs. 14%, p < 0.001), higher maximal LVOT gradient (65 [45–100] vs. 51 [20–89] mmHg, p < 0.001), and elevated E/e’ ratio (14 ± 7 vs. 11 ± 5, p = 0.01). The prevalence of significant late gadolinium enhancement (>15% of myocardial mass) was also higher in women (20% vs. 11%, p = 0.04). Likely pathogenic and pathogenic (LP/P) sarcomeric mutations were identified in approximately one-third of genotyped patients, with no significant sex difference in prevalence. Rates of device implantation, appropriate or inappropriate shocks, heart transplantation and all-cause mortality were similar between men and women. Conclusion In this large cohort of HCM patients, we found that women were often diagnosed later than men despite presenting at baseline with more severe symptoms, higher NT-proBNP levels, worse diastolic function, greater LVOT obstruction, and increased myocardial fibrosis. Our findings emphasize sex-related differences in disease severity at diagnosis and underscore the importance of timely, comprehensive evaluation in women to guide optimal management.HCM
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matias et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (n=550). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Symptomatic burden (NYHA class III-IV) and significant left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction (p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: