Key result
Female sex in HCM shows no significant adjusted mortality increase compared to males.
Why the study?
Emerging evidence suggests sex-based physiological differences in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy presentation, progression, and outcomes despite its autosomal dominant inheritance pattern.
Does female sex affect presentation and outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy compared to male sex?
Cohort (n=207)
No
Does female sex affect presentation and outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy compared to male sex?
Hazard Ratio: 2.09 (95% CI 0.998–4.45)
Absolute Event Rate: 20.5% vs 9.3%
p-value: p=0.057
Females with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are diagnosed later in life, have lower maximal wall thickness, undergo more septal reduction therapies, and may experience worse survival outcomes compared to males.
Females with HCM may face delayed diagnosis and higher unadjusted mortality; leaves open need for sex-specific risk stratification in prospective studies.
OBJECTIVE: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiomyopathy characterised by pathological left ventricular hypertrophy and categorised into obstructive and non-obstructive subtypes. While its autosomal dominant inheritance pattern would suggest similar prevalence, emerging evidence suggests sex-based physiological differences in presentation, progression and outcomes. We sought to better understand these differences in the literature and among our own cohort of patients with HCM. METHODS: A targeted literature review (TLR) of MEDLINE and Web of Science, and subsequent meta-analysis of NT-proBNP captured sex-disaggregated echocardiographic and cardiac MRI values, genetic mutation effects, biomarker levels and outcomes. A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with HCM at University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, UK between January 2007 and January 2025 examined sex-based differences in presentation, diagnosis and outcomes in HCM. RESULTS: The TLR found that females were older at diagnosis and had significantly lower septal and left ventricular wall thickness and left ventricular mass. The meta-analysis showed males had lower NT-proBNP levels than females, potentially reflecting sex-based differences in cardiovascular stress. In our cohort (n=207) comprising 78 (38%) females, age at diagnosis was higher (59.4±20.5 vs 53.5±16.1 years; p=0.026) among females than males, with no significant baseline differences in ethnicity, HCM subtype or social deprivation. Maximal wall thickness was higher in males (21.7±6.8 vs 18.2±2.9 mm; p=0.007). Females had higher rates of septal reduction therapy (44.1% vs 19.6%; p=0.018). Mortality was higher among females (20.5% vs 9.3%; p=0.022; 28 deaths at end of follow-up) though adjusted analyses did not reach significance (HR 2.09, 95% CI 0.998, 4.45; p=0.057). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from our cohort support the results of the TLR that females tend to be diagnosed with HCM later than males and experience worse symptoms and outcomes. Further research should clarify the implications of sex-based disparities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=207). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Mortality (HR 2.09, 95% CI 0.998-4.45, p=0.057). Female patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy had higher unadjusted mortality than males (20.5% vs 9.3%), but adjusted analyses did not reach statistical significance (HR 2.09; 95% CI 0.998-4.45).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: