Key result
Coronary sinus Reducer implantation is linked to an absolute ~30% reduction in moderate-severe SPECT ischaemia.
Why the study?
Although symptomatic improvement after coronary sinus Reducer implantation for refractory angina is well established, its effect on objective measures of inducible ischaemia and predictors of clinical non-response were less well defined.
Does coronary sinus reducer implantation reduce objective measures of inducible ischaemia in patients with refractory angina due to obstructive coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=153)
Does coronary sinus reducer implantation reduce objective measures of inducible ischaemia in patients with refractory angina due to obstructive coronary artery disease?
Coronary sinus reducer implantation significantly reduces objective measures of inducible myocardial ischaemia on stress echocardiography and SPECT in patients with refractory angina.
Coronary sinus reducer was associated with reduced inducible ischaemia on imaging in refractory angina; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background The coronary sinus Reducer (CSR) is a treatment option for patients with refractory angina due to obstructive coronary artery disease who are not candidates for further revascularization. Although symptomatic improvement is well established, its effect on objective measures of ischaemia is less well defined. Purpose To evaluate the effect of CSR implantation on objective measures of inducible ischaemia in patients with refractory angina, and to identify baseline predictors of clinical non-response. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing CSR implantation between 2011 and 2024. Patients underwent baseline assessment—including CCS angina class, six-minute walk test (6MWT), stress echocardiography (stress-Echo) and/or SPECT—and repeated evaluation six months post-procedure. The co-primary outcomes were the change in wall motion score index (WMSI) on stress-Echo and the change in the proportion of patients with moderate or severe ischaemia on SPECT. Clinical non-responders were defined as those without a ≥1-class improvement in CCS angina class at 12 months. Results Of 153 treated patients, 136 had complete stress-Echo or SPECT data. Median WMSI during stress improved from 1.38 to 1.23 (p < 0.001), and median LVEF at stress increased from 55% to 60% (p = 0.019). SPECT imaging showed a significant reduction in the proportion of patients with moderate or severe ischaemia from 55% to 25% (p < 0.001). Clinically, 88% of patients experienced an improvement of ≥1 CCS angina class at six months. Responders had higher baseline LVEF and lower WMSI than non-responders. Conclusions CSR implantation significantly reduced inducible ischaemia on functional stress testing in patients with refractory angina. Baseline myocardial function may help identify patients most likely to benefit from therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gefen et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Refractory angina due to obstructive coronary artery disease (n=153). Coronary sinus Reducer (CSR) implantation vs. Baseline (pre-implantation) was evaluated on Change in wall motion score index (WMSI) on stress-Echo and change in the proportion of patients with moderate or severe ischaemia on SPECT at 6 months (p=<0.001). Coronary sinus Reducer implantation improved stress-Echo median WMSI (1.38 to 1.23; p<0.001) and reduced moderate/severe SPECT ischaemia from 55% to 25% (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: