Key result
VExUS-guided diuresis improves eGFR by ~6 mL/min/1.73m² vs. standard care in acute heart failure.
Why the study?
The Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS) provides a multiparametric assessment of systemic venous congestion in acute heart failure, but randomized evidence supporting VExUS-guided diuretic therapy to preserve renal function was limited.
Does VExUS-guided diuretic therapy improve short-term renal function (change in eGFR between days 3 and 5) compared with standard care in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure?
RCT (n=38)
Open-label
1:1
No
Does VExUS-guided diuretic therapy improve short-term renal function (change in eGFR between days 3 and 5) compared with standard care in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure?
In patients hospitalized with acute heart failure, VExUS-guided diuretic therapy significantly improved short-term renal function (eGFR) and reduced hospital length of stay compared to standard clinical assessment.
Supports VExUS-guided diuretic titration to preserve eGFR in acute HF; extends observational congestion data to randomized evidence.
Background Optimal diuretic management in acute heart failure (AHF) requires balancing effective decongestion with the risk of worsening renal function. Persistent venous congestion is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to cardiorenal dysfunction. The Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS) provides a multiparametric assessment of systemic venous congestion; however, randomized evidence supporting VExUS-guided therapy is limited. Purpose We therefore evaluated whether VExUS-guided diuretic management preserves renal function compared with standard clinical assessment in patients hospitalized with AHF. Methods In this prospective, single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial, 38 patients admitted with AHF (NT-proBNP ≥300 pg/mL) were randomized 1:1 to VExUS-guided therapy or standard care. On day 3 of hospitalization, the intervention group underwent point-of-care ultrasound assessment, including measurement of the inferior vena cava diameter and Doppler evaluation of hepatic, portal, and intrarenal veins (VExUS grades 0–3). Diuretic therapy was adjusted according to VExUS grade: reduced for grades 0–1, maintained for grade 2, and intensified (including sequential nephron blockade) for grade 3. The primary endpoint was the change in eGFR between days 3 and 5. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of cardiorenal syndrome, length of stay, and 30-day HF readmission. Results VExUS-guided therapy resulted in significant improvement in renal function compared with standard care (+5.0±9.2 vs −0.5±7.1 mL/min/1.73m²; mean difference 5.6 mL/min/1.73m², 95% CI 0.16–10.94; p=0.044). Hospital stay was shorter in the VExUS group (median 7 vs 9 days; p=0.035). No patients in the intervention arm developed cardiorenal syndrome compared with 21.1% in controls (p=0.105). Thirty-day readmission rates were numerically lower (5.6% vs 11.8%, p=0.603). Conclusion VExUS-guided decongestion improved short-term renal function and reduced length of stay in AHF. These findings support the use of multiparametric venous congestion assessment to individualize diuretic therapy and potentially mitigate cardiorenal dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lerdrungroj et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Acute heart failure (n=38). VExUS-guided diuretic therapy vs. Standard clinical assessment / care was evaluated on Change in eGFR between days 3 and 5 (MD 5.6 mL/min/1.73m², 95% CI 0.16-10.94, p=0.044). VExUS-guided diuretic therapy improved eGFR from day 3 to 5 compared with standard care in acute heart failure (mean difference 5.6 mL/min/1.73m²; 95% CI 0.16-10.94; p=0.044).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: