Background Once viewed mainly as scavengers of innate immunity, macrophages are now recognized as constitutive partners of the nervous system. In neural tissue their identity is instructed by neurons and glia, and in turn they shape neural function — pruning synapses, tuning neuronal excitability, and executing the autonomic commands that restrain inflammation. Purpose Here we advance a mechanistic model built on three principles: that neural and glial signals specify macrophage identity on a shared myeloid template; that the macrophage is a bidirectional sensor–effector node within autonomic reflex arcs, both relaying neural output and generating the cytokine signals that afferent nerves detect; and that this sensor–effector arc is modular, recurring across brain, spleen, gut, heart, and adipose tissue. We give particular attention to the afferent limb of the inflammatory reflex, which now extends beyond the vagus to nociceptors and to the carotid body, an arterial chemoreceptor that senses circulating inflammatory signals and recruits a sympathetic anti-inflammatory pathway, and to the stress-responsive circuitry through which sympathetic outflow drives myelopoiesis, neuroinflammation, and sickness behavior. We then turn to disease, in which macrophage function is altered by a diseased or aged niche in neurodegeneration, chronic pain, gut–brain disorders, and metabolic disease. Conclusions Whether the neuroimmune circuits described here are themselves disrupted in these conditions, rather than merely coexisting with them, is largely untested, and we outline what such evidence would require. We close by arguing that tuning these circuits, rather than broadly suppressing macrophage activity, is the more plausible therapeutic goal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cruz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: