This article examines the legality of introducing a databased pre-screening stage in the application procedure for internal security volunteers in Estonia. It asks under what conditions automated pre-screening at the outset of administrative procedures can be considered lawful. Three models are analysed: first, a technical solution that prevents the submission of an application following a negative pre-screening result; second, a model in which applications may always be submitted but are subsequently refused by a human official; and third, a model providing for an automated preliminary administrative act determining compliance with objective statutory criteria. The analysis demonstrates that within the Estonian constitutional framework, a technical prohibition on submitting an application is incompatible with guarantees of access to public authorities, effective judicial protection, and the rules on automated decision-making laid down in the General Data Protection Regulation of the European Union. By contrast, two models are legally viable: allowing submission in all cases with subsequent human decision-making, or issuing an automated preliminary administrative act strictly limited to non-discretionary criteria and supported by an explicit legal basis and safeguards. The article argues that a carefully designed pre-screening stage can promote the principle of data minimisation while preserving individual rights and judicial oversight, and proposes a model that may be transferable to other administrative procedures involving objective exclusion criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikiver et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: