Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This section is Section 2 of LSED Appendix I, a working hypothesis and peripheral-boundary review that produces no judgment-layer input. It examines three directional questions:(1)the Dazhushan site (OSL 65.7–52.9 ka) provides positive evidence for traces of human activity to the east within the transition window, assigned to the outward-trace category of Segment A in Section 1 (an indirect trace); the site is a secondary, water-transported deposit with no human bone or hearth found, and the attribution to modern humans is inferred from the lithic assemblage, pending confirmation in the formal report;(2)the southern corridor within the 71–57 ka window shows no continuity (graded ?), microblades postdate the window, their origin is disputed among three schools, and the recent southward pressure is a pulse rather than an expansion; (3) under the western-line filter hypothesis, westward continuity is graded ?, with the Altai as the farthest registered endpoint; the African MIS 4–2 ancient-DNA vacuum is registered as a chronological fact, not a claim of preservation bias. No conclusion here conflicts with any passage of Section 1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jing Zhang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: