This paper abandons all subjective prejudices and discipline‑centric thinking, and proceeds from the ontological laws of the objective material world. It conducts rigorous demonstrations on two core topics: why chemistry holds a dominant position and how chemistry governs material evolution across all scales. By analyzing the cognitive limitations of representative scholars in traditional physics and chemistry and comparing classical theoretical equations with the ontological proportion‑driven evolution equation, this paper clarifies that the constant 3‑to‑1 eigenvalue is a fundamental law derived from the Natural Historical Covenant (the primordial ontological order of objective material reality) and the primal foundation of the material system. This eigenvalue is inherent and invariant, exists prior to all material systems, and endows chemistry with absolute dominance. Relying on this fixed eigenvalue, chemistry governs the entire life‑cycle evolution of material systems through four core processes: interaction, phased transformation, final reduction, and regenerative cycle, covering the macroscale, mesoscale (matter and life), and microscale particles. Based on deductions from subject‑free mathematical‑physical logic free from subjective interference, this paper illustrates the urgency of revising conventional physical and chemical perceptions, defines the ontological direction for the advancement of basic science, and achieves the unification of theories across all scales, processes, and cycles. It possesses solid scientific validity and practical guiding value. This manuscript serves as the foundational theoretical source for the author’s series of independent studies concerning molecular chirality, chemical bonding mechanisms, and the origin of the periodic table of elements. All three sister papers represent concrete scale‑specific manifestations of the universal 3‑to‑1 ontological eigenvalue proposed herein.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bo Liu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: